And we remember those responsible for your death. Never to be forgotten.
And probably Farewell from us too. Job done (unless they float back up again).
In September 2012 we launched this blog purely as a means to expose a pair of sick trolls using the names Roxanne Summers and Heather Jones. Not being sure at the time whether Summers and Jones were real identities, we incorrectly referred to them as ‘she’ in the purely feminine sense. How wrong we were.
Though their behaviour – and that of some very willing accomplices – has been disgusting, this was only ever intended to be a brief and temporary taste of their own medicine, and for a while it turned into a hilarious pantomime with more dumb characters and drama queens than a series of TOWIE.
But in the end, sadly, it exposed the true nature of some vile people and the lengths they were prepared to go in order to harm one particular family, including a young girl, and ultimately an innocent dog.
Lennox would probably be alive today if it wasn’t for the hate campaign waged against him – all the time falsely disguised as ‘concern’ for his welfare – with the sole intention of destroying his family.
That hate campaign began first with Sandie Lightfoot, quickly followed by Sarah Gunther and Peter Tallack, backed to the hilt by their good friends Mel Page, Melanie Rushmore and Tina Delaney. After that, the rest of the dross attached themselves like leeches.
Admittedly we relished turning the tables, exposing their spiteful and often elaborate lies, and it was a pleasure to see them scuttle away, one by one.
Bullying is cowardly and mindless at the best of times, but it’s anyone’s guess what really possessed a twisted collection of morons to attack Lennox’s family. It could be boiled down to the poisonous Lightfoot’s personal vendetta against them, coupled by the family’s shrewd refusal to accept a self-promoting, disingenuous offer of help from animal-abuser and habitual-liar Sarah Gunther. Then came the corrupt testimonies of Lightfoot and Tallack (perjury). But none of that really explains why so many others climbed aboard the gut wagon to intimidate and bully Len’s family – and every single one of them did just that.
We hope that, with the invaluable help of our friends and supporters, we have managed to ensure that Lightfoot, Tallack, Gunther, Page, Rushmore, Phillips, Delaney and the rest of the Hate Campaign will always be remembered for what they are; vindictive, dishonest and cunning.
We will never forget you Lennox. In spite of – or perhaps because of – your tragic and wholly avoidable treatment and death, you will always remain a gentle and beautiful ambassador for all innocent victims of a BullShit Law.
And we will never forget you, sweet, gentle Fudge, unbelievably just five months old when seized and killed – yet another faultless target for callous, spiteful Jobsworths and Trolls, who saw you and your mum as another mark for their twisted malice.
To all our friends and supporters.
Wishing you a very Happy 2014.
To our Subjects, we remind you that nothing is forgotten; there’s no hiding place and sooner or later – well, you know the rest.
It’s just a matter of time …
To make better use of this blog, over the next couple of months we’ll be covering things like, say, how someone who wouldn’t know the truth if it bit her in the ass managed to qualify as a local authority employee, and we’ll be pondering the question ‘Do local authorities conduct thorough employee background checks?‘
On the subject of qualifications (or lack of), since it’s been such a big deal for HC members in the past, we’ll be looking at:
We’ll also have a Did You Know slot every now and then. For example, Did You Know That:
You’ve heard about people with names which mirror their professions, such as The Reverend Michael Vickers, neurologist Lord Brain, prison reformer Frances Crook, Constable Lawless, etc. Strange but true, but it isn’t confined to just surnames – did you know that it can also apply to locations; places where (some) people live?
For example, take NOTTS (Nottinghamshire), and then the homonym KNOTS, as in ‘tied up in knots‘ or ‘a knotty problem‘ :
Hmm, must be something to do with ‘cookies‘ 🙂
Regular readers of the fake Heather Jones will recall that ‘she’ often referred to living in London, but knotted her knickers when one of the screenshots she posted showed advertising related to her real location (Nottingham), something we’ve covered before [link].
There sure is a lot going on in Nottingham:
A mere coincidence The Lav aka LLAAV is hosted via Heart Internet, based in Nottingham?
Well maybe, but if there is to be a moral in this post, it’s more about the tangled web of lies they’ve spun for themselves, rather than a knotty problem.
For instance, some people in certain geographical areas have recently gone to extraordinary lengths denying they are involved, in any way, with The Lav, aka LLAAV (some more material for our Guess Who slots) :
Denial is a pointless exercise for several reasons. For starters, there’s the mind-numbing primary school potty conversations among so-called (okay, self-styled) ‘professionals‘ which are uncannily similar to the juvenile, vacuous rants on The Lav, aka LLAAV, coupled with the HC’s almost unanimous attachment to the ‘C‘ word.
Then there’s the sick mentality that prompts them to randomly accuse people of being ‘stalkers of children‘ (go figure), and at least one of them will instantly brand you a ‘pedo‘ (he means ‘paedo‘) every chance he gets, for no apparent reason, other than that subject must be on his mind 24/7 – the same type of sick mentality that controlled the Heather Jones and Roxanne Summers profiles, among others – birds of a feather and all that.
(Which reminds us, where did ‘Angela Mannering’ disappear to?)
Finally, a word to our sponsors – we know some of you are worried (ah bless) that we spend too many precious hours blogging about your antics but, as we told Heather Jones a few months back (before ‘she’ was put out to pasture), on average it takes us about half an hour to stick a blog post together, sometimes a lot less, and that’s because you’ve been kind enough to supply so much material for us to choose from. So there’s really no need to fret. However, we’re not ungrateful, and your concern is noted and appreciated.
We thought it might be interesting, and revealing, to have a guess the author slot on the blog.
Original, uncensored screenshots will be posted at a later date, but for now we’ve removed anything that could identify the people commenting; the only clues being in the content and style of writing.
Apart from giving us the chance to make use of unused material and screenshots buried in previous posts, it’s a very handy way of identifying individuals through their writing characteristics without a false name diverting attention away from the real identity, but we’ll also add a few screenshot comments from people who have used their own names.
Apologies if some of the screenshots seem a bit ‘random’, there’s a reason they’ve been used which will become obvious when the authors are revealed.
The comments option on this particular blog entry is temporarily disabled.
Guess Who Pt I
1: This person was found stalking Victoria Stilwell, DDA Watch and the Free Lennox page on Facebook :
While we’re showing this, can anyone, anyone at all, please send us evidence that Lennox’s owners : a) ‘collected money fraudulently‘; b) ‘made accusations about dozens of people that are simply untrue‘; and c) ‘made threats, been abusive and harassed anyone who ever asked a question‘ – [link].
It’s interesting that this person offered to provide proof of those accusations only via private message and didn’t feel able to post it in public anywhere, at any time. Please bear that in mind when we reveal the author next week.
» » » » » » »
The same person who wrote that also composed this:
“It does not mean they are expert. Their evidence to the court is their opinion“!! 🙂
It doesn’t matter which one of the HC wrote this, it’s still a total contradiction of everything they’d previously agreed upon to say, but it suited this person’s vindictive agenda on that occasion to change tack (yet again). We’ll get to that another time.
For the moment, please note and keep in mind the final paragraph in that post.
» » » » » » »
3: We’re including this one not so much to compare styles of writing, more for the content :
We’ll cover what’s been said here later, but for anyone who hasn’t followed the HC campaign from the beginning, basically Terry Twoons was a fake profile set-up/used-by Sandie Lightfoot, and it disappeared darn quick! As soon as Lightfoot was rumbled in fact. More on that another time.
» » » » » » »
4: A warning to owners of seized dogs. If you upset certain members of the HC, don’t be surprised if you find yourself on the receiving end of one of their dirty tricks campaigns :
This person, and several other HC members, certainly did try their hand at ‘reporting’ Lennox’s family to the tax and benefits offices. Didn’t do them any good of course, because there was nothing to report, therefore no outcome.
Interestingly, some members of the HC were a bit shy about using their own names to do the ‘reporting’. Now that could be because several of them are on benefits themselves (Lennox’s family was not), or it could be they risked further damage to already sullied reputations owing to their complete lack of self-control.
» » » » » » »
5: One of our personal favourites :
» » » » » » »
7: How low can you go :
» » » » » » »
8: Two people commenting together, side by side on Victoria Stilwell’s page. Unusual considering one of them claims to have had nothing to do with the Hate Campaign nor the people in it up to their necks, and therefore that person surely wouldn’t be seen dead stalking Victoria Stilwell ? :
We’ve already wiped the floor with their Attorney General claims [link 1 / link 2] although to be fair it wasn’t difficult, and nobody took any notice of the HC prattling on about bomb threats and incendiary devices, because we all have Internet access and found out for ourselves what a crock that was. In fact even BCC couldn’t answer questions about their own accusations. But we’ll cover that subject in another blog entry as it’s something we haven’t touched on before. Besides, it will give us the chance to show more examples of the bile spewing forth from people who currently would prefer to be seen as innocent and squeaky clean.
9: Before we leave Part I, here’s another snapshot of those same two people, who had nothing much to do with one another apparently, but here they’re found commenting on one of their own personal Facebook pages. What a coincidence, not :
Guess Who Part II coming soon
Many of you have been on the receiving end of the Hate Campaign’s extreme malice in the past, and we’ve seen enough of their atrocious behaviour since starting this blog (in October last year, Kay!) so we know they’re totally incapable of being upfront and honest, nor will they take responsibility for anything unless it’s in their interests to do so.
We’re updating this entry first and foremost to apologise to the person we criticised for writing the comment in the screenshot below:
We’re apologising because we have discovered that the person who made that comment posted it on someone’s private Facebook wall.
In other words she made the comment openly; it was not posted to a page or a group nor intended to be taken seriously. On top of that, her comment was posted before Mel Page claims it turned up on a ‘secret group‘, a fact Page is fully aware of, which won’t surprise anyone.
The ‘mass reporting‘ being referred to was directed solely at HC members Diane End BSL Percival and Debbie Gathercole, a backlash following their double-act trolling sessions. The rest of the thread clearly shows its directed at Gathercole and Percival, something Page and Company do not want you to see. And yes, we have been sent screenshots of the whole thread, along with email notifications and we’ll be happy to include them here.
So when Mel Page claimed the screenshot they had just ‘been sent‘ was taken from a ‘secret group‘, she was lying, again.
The group Page is trying to pin that on was created last Monday (24 June) as an open group, and deactivated the following day. It was an unaffiliated group created purely for debate purposes. The admin had posted links to this blog and The Lav and clearly stated anyone was welcome to join and voice their opinion, whoever they supported. As you can probably guess, Percival and Gathercole were at the front of the queue.
So that group has nothing whatsoever to do with anything really, contrary to what Page would have you believe. But that didn’t stop her trying it on, again:
When will she ever learn. If she must lie through her teeth, you’d think she’d learn to cover her tracks. Heaven knows she’s had enough practice.
But the point of this Update is to show that once again Page’s attempts at damage limitation have taken her down to shabby and contemptible levels.
We should have guessed that Page and Company were up to something, but at the time we were shocked that anyone could suggest reporting the deed not breed page, so we thought maybe, just this once, they were genuine, and we were willing to give that a shot.
Page and Company knew exactly where that screenshot came from. At first we thought one of their lapdogs, Percival or Gathercole, had provided them with it, but as it turns out they didn’t have to, because the comment was posted to someone else’s domestic and open Facebook wall. That means Page knew exactly what the comments referred to, so she knew it had nothing to do with Deed not breed.
Page’s transcribed comment below. It’s difficult to look at the rank hypocrisy in her statement without responding, but we’ll leave that for picking over in the next blog entry:
“We have been sent this screenshot from a ‘secret’ group where a link to the website that has been causing so much trouble has been posted (this link is also being sent via private message). They are, as you can see making plans to either mass report this page or make up ‘fake’ cases for us. First of all, you clearly have no idea how we work. We would contact the police regarding ANY dog we deal with so would soon find out if a case/dog was fake. How immature, stupid and potentially dangerous your behaviour is. If you ‘mass report’ this page, we will continue our work as we have for years before we joined facebook. What you WILL do is potentially cause the deaths of dogs who’s owners come to us for help via facebook. I am disgusted. We both are. This is exactly the sort of crap we’ve been dealing with for months now.”
…that today (April 18th) is another National Stalking Awareness Day. Very appropriate in view of the Hate Campaign’s vendetta against Lennox’s family, their expert witness and close Save Lennox Campaign supporters, considering much of the HC’s vendetta has been about lies, gossip and personal attacks, including stalking and phone calls.
Our last post on this particular subject for the time being so we can concentrate on other things, unless of course they devise something else to blame us for 🙂
Just a quickie about something mentioned on Friday regarding Ted Ismay and his anti-paedophile groups. In a nutshell, Ismay made contact with a group admin and, in turn, that admin checked Ismay’s page, where he found the collection of posts mentioned in our earlier blog entry (link) and little else. In other words, there was nothing on Ismay’s page to indicate it was dedicated to anything other than the content of his warped state of mind.
Not long after that Ismay hid or removed all traces of his defamatory comments with the excuse that his kids were reading his wall. A strange thing to say considering he was the one concocting detailed sick stories which had been sitting on his page for some time, unless they’re used to seeing that tripe.
However, the admin did say that he’d passed Ismay’s details on to another group. We also understand from one of our followers that several similar groups and pages have now been contacted with a full explanation and links back to this site.
Mel Page and Ted Ismay have the morals of a gnat. As we’ve seen, they are prepared to say absolutely anything to deflect attention away from themselves, even to the point of dragging children into their spiteful games.
Their attempts at diversion reek of desperation and are so transparent it’s embarrassing, the same pattern of behaviour for all Hate Campaign members since their vendetta began.
So never mind Mel Page’s false claim of ‘guilt by association‘. With the disappearance of two major trolls, Heather Jones and Roxanne Summers, various other profiles and groups, even a child could figure out that Ismay and Page are in it up to their necks.
But, according to them, they have nothing to do with any of it; they’re entirely blameless, and yet Ms Page gives herself a get-out clause by saying she might have ‘retaliated‘.
They claim to be victims but they have fully supported and backed those involved with the HC in public from day one. That short memory lets them down every time – one minute they’re ‘guilty by association‘, then they’re ‘retaliating‘, and at other times just plain ‘innocent‘.
The fact that they have now removed comments, deactivated spare and fake profiles, wiped out Tweets and various other associations, is very revealing, but neither here nor there, since it was a waste of their time.
Time and again we’ve heard how the poor innocent things have been subjected to all kinds of uncalled-for abuse. There’s the ‘paramilitary threats‘ claim with no evidence to support it; the ‘I’ve been accused of threatening a child with violence‘, again with no evidence. Mel Page constantly refers back to vile threats and abuse, but no one has seen anything valid to support any of her claims.
And then there’s the incident where Mr Ismay allegedly took a ‘beating‘, altered and used against their targets. We know most people believe he either came off his bike or made himself unpopular with some locals and got smacked around a bit, but whatever the reason for his injuries, he and Page made sure that they ‘heavily implied’ Save Lennox supporters were responsible in some way for the alleged attack. Once again, totally untrue and with no evidence to back up their claims. Story of their life.
The ‘baseball bat threats’…
Mel Page was the first person ever to mention ‘baseball bats and dark alleys‘ in the context of a not-so veiled threat (and there’s that mention of her ‘police friends’ yet again). When the people she named in that comment took exception and retaliated, Page swiftly changed her mind and it suddenly became ‘a wish and not a threat‘.
But putting that aside, the real thing highlighted in that screenshot is her obsession with Hate Campaign targets. She’s not observing, she’s taking part. In fact it wasn’t even ‘retaliation‘ on her part; it was a random comment she made about a subject she herself initiated. So much for ‘guilty by association‘.
As for the ‘Ann Banford‘ profile having nothing whatsoever to do with her, all we can say is, Mel Page should have quit while she had the chance on that one. It’s probably the most ridiculous claim she’s made so far.
But you have to hand it to her, she went the whole hog, insisting she knows nothing about any ‘Ann Banford‘, which is really odd, because that particular Ann Banford routinely posted on HC pages and groups targeting the exact same people Page mentions in her ‘baseball bat and alleyway‘ comment. What a coincidence.
In any case, that Ann Banford (with the same url address shown in the screenshot below) was a regular visitor to the very same HC pages Mel Page frequented all the time. It’s not as if she can validly say she hadn’t noticed Ann Banford, because there have always been just a small handful of HC members posting on those pages at any one time. Not exactly crowded or busy. Certainly not busy enough to miss someone commenting on a HC target…
It’s plain silly to say she wasn’t posting under that profile, but apparently Page didn’t stop there. Bearing in mind Kathy Wardley’s blooper calling Larry Lawrence ‘Mel’…
Think we can safely say that’s not Mel Gibson in disguise.
Finally, a word on our non-existent attacks on Deed not Breed. That fabrication comes from the same mould as Mel Page’s claims that her kids are being stalked, and similarly she has no evidence to support the statement that we want to destroy DnB, because there isn’t any. She knows that of course; Page also knows that she is the only person damaging DnB, aided and abetted by the articulate Ted Ismay. Some free advice for the pair of them – time to grow up.
We’re not sure what this is…
Ted Ismay is definitely saying that a retired MoD officer is being stalked, but he’s also alluding to the fact that this particular officer still has access to Police databases. What could he possibly mean by that? We do hope he’s not insinuating that retired MoD police officer would consider breaking the law?
In response to one or two enquiries and comments on Friday’s entry, and the subject referred to, we confirm that it is genuine information in the form of a Facebook conversation carried out in public (i.e. not in a private or secret group).
Yes, it would be considered damaging to the people involved and, although we will not refer to it again unless absolutely necessary, it will be made available to authorities who wish to see it, including those investigating on behalf of Ms Page.
And that, as far as we’re concerned, is an end to the matter, for the moment at least. If Messrs Page & Ismay wish to wile away some time responding, that’s up to them; good luck with that.
Ted Ismay is obviously hellbent on taking that one-way trip up Shite Creek, with all the out of control rants he’s come out with lately. So before he spontaneously combusts, we thought it would be good to do some of the work for him.
In addition, Mel Page has changed her story again, and the investigation is now back on (or never went away, it’s confusing), but whatever the current explanation is, this post may help with ongoing investigations.
If you haven’t already seen the following piece of babble from Ismay, basically he’s saying you are a ‘stalker‘ if you’re not his ‘friend’ and you dare read his public Facebook page.
However, he’s taken an innocuous comment about someone else’s TWO DOGS and turned it into the stalking of his CHILDREN to satisfy his need to spread more bile using two of his favourite words, ‘pervert’ and ‘pedo’. He missed out the ‘C’ word this time, which is surprising really because it’s one of his and Mel’s faves.
Poor, extremely dense Ted, it hasn’t occurred to him that he’s the one looking like a fixated pervert with a one-track mind…
The comments Ted Ismay removed from his page are posted verbatim below to aid various investigations, including those of Mel Page’s legal team of course, and also to ensure they crop up on the Internet.
Speaking of ‘investigations’, for someone who has been advised by her solicitor to keep it zipped, Mel Page is certainly vocal on the Hate Campaign pages (the ones she doesn’t have anything to do with), even going as far as repeating Ismay’s ‘stalking pervert’ lies. Chances are it’s just a case of The Flounders all over again, but a reckless game to play nonetheless.
Mel Page is also suffering from HC Short Memory Syndrome, though it’s no problem to help her out there:
The first part of that screenshot shows Mel Page going through the motions for the sake of an audience (that’s us and you) on a page she has ‘nothing to do with’, Lem Thirteen. Wonder why she bothers. But presumably she’s referring to this:
So this is what she’s referring to, the ‘false allegation‘? Good, that’s cleared that up and it would account for her denial of wrongdoing, because in fact she used her Ann Banford account to do the deed, and not the Mel Page or Melanie Page profiles. (And it’s over to the Mel & Ted double-act to flesh that one out a bit more for their audience; will be interesting to see their version).
For two people who claim to be ‘innocent’ (at least their definition of it), they crop up in all sorts of HC places, going back several months. They’re also very defensive, to the point of raising things nobody has even mentioned. We realise it’s their attempt at deflection, but it’s a bit daft to bring up unsubstantiated claims of ‘being accused of threatening a child with a baseball bat‘, etc, and drawing attention to subjects it hadn’t occurred to us to cover. (Wait for it, they’ll mention their unproven ‘paramilitary threats’ again soon).
♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
Ted Ismay Facebook says:
“Dennis, stop stalking my page and my children, that’s just perverted. Are you a pedo? The problem you are going to have is should my kids be contacted, messaged or even contacted by your shitty little blog then those that I do have addresses for will be paying for your mistake. And before you class that as a threat, it’s not, it’s a fucking promise and if you know as much about me as you wish to have your little gang believe then you know what I am willing and capable of doing. Its up to you old hoss, do you want to progress this into something you cannot control or stop?”
“This is the profile picture of the person that is stalking myself and has now insinuated that he is stalking my kids. If you see or hear about this person the owner behind this profile is a twat. It goes by the name of dennisstephens59 and is connected with the lennox campaign, headed by craig winters and supported by Ange Manners aka Roxi Bennetti, Doreen Davies, Maria Fawcett, Carol Eden, Clare Campbell, Julie Boyland and Charlie Smith. I will post these peoples profile accounts on my page later and I will also post their profile accounts on every anti pedo wall on facebook, because in my eyes stalking kids and supporting those that stalk kids are as bad as each other“
♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
Just a quickie before we leave the blog for the weekend.
This from Mel Page in response to our post of the day ..
Thanks to Mel Page for clearing that up and confirming that no stalking of kids, as they claimed, occurred, owing to the fact that at least one of the made-up kids is a CAT (the other fake ‘kid’ is a DOG presumably).
And yes, we stand corrected again, it was Our Mistake to leave Huge Mistake’s comment out of the post. Seems Mel & Ted had one of their little double acts going on that day…
Finally, we’ve had an email informing us that Mr Ismay has made a prat of himself yet again, this time by contacting at least two known (and legitimate) anti-paedophile groups regarding his sick fake stalking claims.
However, an admin on one of those groups is a follower of this blog, not good news for Ted. On Monday we’ll post what the admin has to say about Mr Ismay and his comments.
Have a good weekend.
So, after seeking legal advice at least a month ago, Ms Page has only just been informed that her complaint is a civil matter, and it’s a no-can-do.
They didn’t tell her at the time, when she first complained and provided all her evidence, they waited until now to explain the legal processes. Why didn’t she ask her ‘Police friends‘? They could have told her the same thing ages ago. And it’s a mystery why her solicitor waited this long to explain nothing can be done. On top of that, at least part of her ‘complaint’ must have been made well over a year ago owing to her unsubstantiated claims of personal and paramilitary threats that have been floating around for months.
As for the fake ID’s, that’s rich – the next thing you know she’ll be claiming Heather Jones, a bunch of other Jones‘s, Angela Mannering, Billie Bennet, Larry Lawrence, twins Isabella & Nikola Black and even Roxanne Summers are all real !).
The only mildly savvy thing she’s done so far is use aliases, a Facebook admin and a ‘handle’ on the LLAAV website to post her bile, alongside using her own name to appear squeaky clean, which didn’t quite work out because she let herself go on more than one occasion. So much for having nothing to do with the Hate Campaign or any of its’ outlets.
Think we can safely say that Mel Page did not contact a solicitor or the police with or without ‘evidence’ for the simple reason that (as she knows very well) if something could be done about her complaints, her online activities would also be exposed, along with those of Ted Ismay. Page knows that in any police involvement regarding Internet crime, the track records of all concerned would be scrutinised.
As for the rest of that speech, it’s another crock again, familiar Hate Campaign stuff – the ‘poor me I’ve been caught out‘, ‘I’m the victim in all this now‘. They do it every time, predictable and samey. Well, Page should have thought about that before.
But in one of her remarks above, the ‘I’m the victim‘ whinging has taken an altogether nasty turn with her accusation that ‘friends and children‘ are being targeted and stalked. Desperate and very silly. What ‘friends’ would they be we wonder, her Hate Campaign colleagues? And the ‘kids‘ someone referred to, they would be another person’s ‘dogs‘ right?
If Page insists on spreading lies accusing others of stalking and targeting her children and Ismay wants to chance his arm branding people ‘pedo’s‘ (below), they should be extremely thankful this really is currently a civil matter, otherwise they’d both be up Shite Creek with both arms tied behind their backs.
Mel Page and Ted Ismay are finally reaping the benefits of their malicious stupidity and should take their own advice; “they seem to think they can say what they like…without any backlash. Not true“. As for their ‘bite’, it’s toothless.
Before we go…
Ismay eventually removed that post. Maybe he realised that naming people he would like to think have a hand in this blog makes him look even more stupid than usual, or maybe it crossed his mind that taking yet another comment out of context, for his own very unhealthy reasons, was a bit too revealing.
The ‘kids’ he’s referring to are dogs, believe it or not, but Ismay thought or hoped nobody would notice. Besides, that lie came in very handy for his own sordid purposes to spread yet another sick rumour, in true HC style. (Ted has had his fair share of ‘mucky’ little conversations on Facebook in the past. Shame he has a short memory, otherwise he’d have steered well clear of accusing someone of speaking inappropriately in the same sentence as he mentions ‘kids’).
In the screenshot below Ted got cold feet and quickly changed the names of his victims to initials, but he forgot that the editing history of Facebook comments remains visible. Not the brightest bulb is he…
A word of warning from the Hate Campaign – did you know that if you read one of their public Facebook pages, but you’re not actually friends with that person and that person hasn’t given you direct permission to look at their public page, then you are officially a Stalker? But if they do the same to you, that’s perfectly okay?
We’ve been here before it’s true (link) and you all know we don’t need to spend too much time on this, it’s cut and dried. You also know (thanks to Mel Page) that we are being ‘investigated’, so it is our aim to assist in any way we can (after all, that’s why we’re here, although it doesn’t look as if that has dawned on them yet. Give them time, it’s only been seven months!).
For our most recent visitors, we’ll begin by stating the obvious, that the Hate Campaign have maintained, without proof of any kind (no change) that Lennox’s family received untold thousands in donations.
In fact the viper behind Heather Jones at one point concluded at least £60k had been collected.As someone rightly said “Sixty grand, a quid for every nasty and vindictive thought that has ever run through the person behind Jones’ warped and tiny mind“.
Can’t argue with that, although 60k vile thoughts for that ‘person’ sounds a bit on the moderate side to us, and it’s obviously not confined to thoughts alone.
The following is the SUM TOTAL of the Hate Campaign’s ‘evidence’ that copious amounts of cash was received in donations :
This is an interesting one. For some reason they’re still using the screenshot below to back up their claims that donations were received(?), but as you can see it’s a £1 refund.
In fact that particular refund went straight back to the person who donated it, one Mel Page, who apparently only sent it to check if donations were being accepted so that she could go and report back to the other HC members.
That screenshot was originally provided some time ago by Mel Page for use on the various Hate Campaign pages and the HC website, LLAAV (affectionately known as The Lav).
So much for Mel Page’s protestations that she was never directly involved with the Hate Campaign…
We all know Page is a main player in the HC; her reasoning behind this was to prove donations were being taken so that she and her HC friends could start the ball rolling with false accusations of a ‘donations scam’. Shame she wasn’t brave enough to make it a fiver, or maybe she assumed Caroline Barnes was as dishonest as she is, and wouldn’t give it back.
Page (along with her pal Gunther) also knows, from her experience running Deed not Breed that Legal Aid did not cover the expert witness brought in by Lennox’s family (see below).
The following screenshot shows a donation given by someone who at one time had a foot in both camps, and is now a fully fledged member of the Hate Campaign, Ann Endbsl Roberts:
And that’s it. That’s all they have.
This is what their whole campaign is based around. Let’s not forget Sarah Gunther also mentioned donations, she’s someone else who apparently has nothing to do with the Hate Campaign. For two people who are supposed to be detached from a vendetta against Lennox’s family, their names sure do crop up a lot in relation to the spreading of lies and gossip against Len’s family and the Save Lennox Campaign in general.
The rest of the HC ‘evidence’ is based on claiming that ‘someone‘ told them she was donating £200 each and every month, and apparently you’re all supposed to be daft enough to believe it!
It gets better – according to the HC, they’ve been contacted by absolutely loads of people who donated, but guess what? Every last one of those people has decided they don’t want any details whatsoever revealed, and so we all just have to take their word for it.
The best bit – the HC claim that the people who have ‘confided’ in them are so afraid of reprisals if they ‘tell’ (!) they won’t even allow the HC to give out rough figures without any other details. Not wishing to appear rude, but if you believe that you’ll believe anything!
And it doesn’t end there, they’ve accused Lennox’s owners of a veritable catalogue of crimes, including :
(For anyone conducting an investigation, we will be more than happy to provide screenshots of all the above at any time.)
It’s interesting that at least two of the accusers are receiving State benefits, when in fact Lennox’s owners were not, so it’s a bit rich to label someone else a ‘scrounger’, but as we said in Gunther’s post (link), how the hell could they know anyway?
Legal Aid and the Expert Witness
The Truth is that the Expert Witness was not covered by Legal Aid (but then they already knew that, and if the flotsam didn’t know it, the jetsam certainly did).
For the record, and as those people running certain organisations already know, the expert witness was paid by Lennox’s owners and, for a ballpark figure fee, consider that Peter Tallack received £7,500 from Belfast City Council for his so-called ‘expert opinion’.
No doubt they felt safe spreading gossip and lies hiding behind the fake profiles, and having their lies questioned and exposed obviously hadn’t occurred to any of them at the time.
Well, it’s certainly occurred to several of them now, judging by their ever-dwindling Hate Campaign numbers.
It’s a tribute to everyone else’s common sense that they haven’t really been challenged on this one before, which shows nobody gives any credence to their malice. But it wouldn’t do to let them get off Scott-free with their bullying and lies.
You have informed us that there was indeed a running total for donations placed on the Save Lennox website, which was approximately £2,500, but certainly nothing even close to the wild amount the HC claimed was received. That total was publicised much later in the campaign so by any stretch of the imagination it’s hardly likely to have reached enough to pay for the expert witness, let alone a new BMW.
Malicious minds produce malicious acts, and they really went for it with this one without one ounce of proof.
…what happened to the Roxanne Summers profiles? It’s a mystery.
We followed that with Connections, at which point not only did all the Roxanne Summers profiles disappear, but also Boycott Boycott Belfast and the ‘real les trollops‘ WordPress site. Zapped, overnight, literally.
On top of that, several people mentioned in ‘Connections‘ cleaned up their Facebook pages pronto and one in particular began the process of removing or hiding comments, Tweets and associations (too late, sorry Ms Page). Now why would anyone do that if they had nothing to hide?
Was it all because of our recent posts? The Bar Council’s response to several complaints about Summers might have had something to do with it as well and, as we understand Mel Page’s solicitor is reading this blog in order to gather evidence (as are the Police according to her), we thought it would be helpful to show this:
The attached letter from Kathy Smyth stated:
05 March 2013
Re: Professional Conduct Committee – Your Complaint Against A Member of the Bar of Northern Ireland
I have been asked to write to you on behalf of the Professional conduct committee regarding your recent complaint.
Enquiries have been made on behalf of the Committee and it has been confirmed that there is no Counsel at the Bar of Northern Ireland by the name of Roxanne Summers.
It does appear however that a person using that name on Facebook has represented that he or she is a barrister.
Two possibilities arise, namely;
1. The person operating under the name Roxanne Summers is not in fact a barrister and the representation is false, or
2. The person is a member of the bar but is not using their real name.
The Committee is making further enquiries to establish whether it is possible to confirm which of these possibilities is correct.
In the meantime, the committee would welcome any further information, which might assist in establishing whether the person in question is in fact a member of the Northern Ireland Bar.
The committee is due to meet again on 12th March and you shall be notified of any further developments.
Professional Conduct Committee
Needless to say we can post no further comments from the Bar Council at this time, but obviously that will be forthcoming when Ms Page’s legal team have completed their investigation, which hopefully will be soon.
After all, if they’re all as innocent and blameless of the deeds highlighted in this blog as they claim to be, doesn’t it make sense to punish us with legal action? If they’re truly guiltless it won’t cost them a penny, and our identities can be revealed. So what could possibly be stopping them?
We await to hear from them. Meanwhile, we’ll leave you with this thought. Why did the Roxanne Summers profiles, an HC Facebook page and a website disappear overnight, and why did various people clean up their Facebook pages and Tweets immediately after we posted the February entries mentioned above? Another mystery!
For the love of dogz by Sarah Gunther
»» Bruce :
“Our solicitor was Alison Douglas. She was committed and no nonsense. She cried with us when the judge ruled in our favour and was professional throughout the whole legal ordeal. She also helped with the last legal bill! She knows how wrong BSL is and went way beyond her call of duty to help Bruce.”
"Alison was the first solicitor Lennox owners had and she stepped down as their legal counsel only a few short months into the case. She was vilified by the owners and their followers and countless stories were made up. People forget or do not know that a solicitor can’t just step down from a case, they have to state their case as to why to a judge and obviously it was good enough for the Judge to grant it."
Yes, Ms Douglas did step down, and that’s because she was spreading herself a bit thin. Ms Douglas made errors regarding evidence and relating to the instructing of an expert witness. If the owners had simply dismissed her they would have been assigned a solicitor chosen by the court.
To avoid that happening, and to give themselves enough time to instruct a solicitor who would be more committed, the owners informed Ms Douglas they were aware she had made certain mistakes and she therefore took herself off the case. Furthermore, she was not ‘vilified’ by the owners, they simply told the truth. If others chose to ‘vilify’ her, the owners can hardly be responsible for that.
"Since Alison was our legal rock for Bruce so why did she pack in the case? She must have had a very very good reason for stepping down and I am sure she will eventually answer the question when put to her."
Refer to our response above, plus enquire about a certain ‘conflict of interest’. Ms Douglas will no doubt answer that question when put to her.
"Anyone who asked Lennox’ owner was told she hates dogs and is pro BSL – this we KNOW to be untrue, given our experience with her and the way she handled Bruce’s case."
Ms Gunther provides no evidence to substantiate that accusation.
"Could it be that the very first assessor of Lennox for the defense stated that Lennox was aggressive? Why did the assessment of Lennox by Madeleine Forsythe never presented to the Courts? Could it be that Alison realised she had been lied to by the very people whom she represented?"
Madeleine Forsythe was indeed the first assessor. She was not known to, nor requested by, Lennox’s owners and was, in fact, brought in by someone else – we suggest Ms Gunther asks Alison Douglas to apprise her of that, if she hasn’t done so already.
In brief, Ms Forsythe assessed Lennox for over an hour (contrary to fabrications and gossip, she took him out of the kennel without using a catchpole) but her written report described a different dog and was dated incorrectly. Ms Forsythe was not allowed to be mentioned in court and therefore that assessment was not used.
"YES, many of you have never heard of Madeleine Forsythe, have you? Lennox’ owners kept that one VERY quiet, aye?"
It’s evident from that comment Ms Gunther’s relationship with Alison Douglas isn’t as cosy as she makes out, because Ms Douglas would have told her that Madeleine Forsythe’s name and assessment was ‘kept quiet’ for legal reasons, as instructed by the court. Or perhaps Ms Gunther did know, but was just scoring another cheap point.
As for the rest of that post, it’s hardly worth bothering with. We all know that Lennox was ‘deemed highly unstable and aggressive‘ by extremely unreliable and, let’s face it, very dodgy sources. Enough said about that, for now.
And then there’s Bruce, whose owners ‘cooperated’ with Sarah Gunther. In other words, they did as they were told and she got her hands on the dog.
“HOW did a yard dog all of a sudden become a *therapy* dog? WHY had the solicitor dropped the case? WHY the need for donations when the whole case was funded by Free Legal Aid? WHY did the vet, who allegedly treated Lennox for hair loss, not testify, neither did the dog trainer they allegedly had? WHY did none of the neighbours testify on Lennox’s behaviour? WHY did the owner now say that her daughter was traumatised when the dog warden ripped the dog from her arms when she stated clearly in her email to EGAR that her daughter was in school?”
For starters, Gunther’s got a bloody cheek asking those questions. But considering she was seriously pissed off that her offer had been rejected, it makes sense.
As with pretty much everything the Hate Campaign churn out as ‘fact’, Gunther had no proof whatsoever that Lennox was a yard dog, that’s just pure spite; similarly the ‘therapy’ dog remark. In one instance on her blog Gunther is piqued because she wasn’t made aware of certain facts, so those facts she then decided were henceforth going to be called ‘lies’. Why the hell would the owners tell her what’s going on anyway?
The solicitor question has been answered previously, and as for donations and ‘the whole case was funded by Free Legal Aid‘, that’s another nasty HC lie, but quite how Gunther can claim to be privy to protected information is anyone’s guess.
Even if, as we all suspect, a certain BCC employee was leaking documents and information, she would not have access to those details. But, as usual, what the HC don’t know, they make up as they go along.
As you all know, there never was thousands and thousands received in donations, Caroline Barnes received only partial Legal Aid and David Ryan’s assessment was not covered by it. Anyone who says differently is a vindictive and malicious liar because there is no way those outside of the family, their legal team and people they choose to confide in can possibly have access to that privileged information. Not even a fake barrister or a dog warden.
The vet question is bizarre – why would a vet testify? Does Gunther think a vet would do that out of the goodness of their heart, and not charge a blinding hourly fee for the privilege?
The neighbours’ question is probably the daftest one to date, and she hasn’t shown any evidence for asking the last question (you can’t have failed to notice that, in spite of their claims never to bring the child into the mix, without fail they always manage to mention or allude to her in some way. Nice people.).
"**The dog wardens attended on 19 May 2010. One of the wardens, Ms Lightfoot, attempted to examine the dog in the kitchen. The dog was very agitated, barking and growling. The dog lunged at her head and hit her with his muzzle. She was unable to carry out the examination because the dog was repeatedly lunging at her. The applicant finally agreed that the dog wardens could take the dog and she placed the dog in the Council van.**
It took her months to gain Lennox’s trust and she was the one who handled the dog when the assessments were carried out. This was used against her in the following hate campaign against her person. Absolutely ludicrous."
Regarding the day Lennox was seized, at one point there were five adults in that kitchen, four of them strangers in uniform.
Ms Lightfoot testified that ‘the Appellant’s kitchen was neither small nor crowded‘ but it’s our understanding that the kitchen is not large at all and is narrow in shape. In other words, everyone in that room would have been in close proximity to each other, and we don’t know of any dog who is likely to be comfortable in that situation.
However, regarding the ‘lunge’ (that word they love to use for greater impact) and Lightfoot being ‘hit on the head’ by Lennox’s muzzle – another dog warden who was present on that occasion, on being questioned in court, pointed to her chest whilst physically describing how Ms Lightfoot was hit, and the other warden didn’t testify on that question at all. The police officer had already left prior to Lennox being removed from the house, so that just left the three dog wardens, one of which couldn’t seem to make up her mind where on Lightfoot’s body Lennox had made contact.
It always brings a wry smile, whenever we see statements like this: ‘It took her (Lightfoot) months to gain Lennox’s trust‘. Visual evidence says something entirely different, with Lightfoot looking extremely relaxed and comfortable in Lennox’s company virtually from the off (e.g. link), and what Ms Gunther means by ‘against her person‘ is anyone’s guess, but chances are she’s alluding to the unsubstantiated claims of physical harassment again. Absolutely ludicrous!
"Their own defence expert said in Court: ** On the other hand Mr David Ryan, on behalf of the applicant, in a report dated 16 March 2011 recorded that when he reached over the dog’s head to clip a line to the back of his collar in one m
ovement the dog lunged towards him, growled, barked and snapped.**"
Covered previously (link). This is another example of how Gunther and the rest of the HC prefer to take quotes out of context or, in this case, accidentally-on-purpose omit the rest of the statement, which is: ‘fortunately the dog did not bite Mr (Ryan) although he acknowledged that it could have done so if it had wanted to.‘.
Mr Ryan’s own report states: ‘in one movement he lunged towards me, growled, barked and snapped. He did not make.contact with me and returned to sit with Ms Lightfoot. As he did so, I again offered him cheese, which he took immediately in a relaxed manner‘.
The owner admitted in Court: **The applicant accepted that the dog was of the type known as a Pit Bull Terrier and that she was guilty of the offence of being the keeper of such a dog within Article 25A of the 1983 Order as amended. **"
Given Ms Gunther’s familiarity with BSL and court procedures, we’re surprised she’s bothered drawing attention to that. She knows full well the reason for the ‘applicant’s acceptance’ that the dog was type and, even so, her friends over at Deed not breed could no doubt explain the procedure to her.
But she’s pushing her luck expecting anyone to believe she’s unaware that agreeing with an assessment, pleading guilty to owning a banned type and cooperating with the courts would be the only way to get a dog like Lennox home, because it would then be based on temperament and, since Lennox had never had any complaints and no incidents had ever occurred, it should have been cut and dried.
Unfortunately, at the time, no one could have foreseen the likes of Tallack and Lightfoot making up stories about Lennox’s aggression, ensuring only one tragic outcome.
And finally to Sarah Gunther’s bullet point Q’s:
Before we go….
"PS. NONE of us were against Lennox to suggest otherwise is ludicrous, we are, however, anti lies and deception. And to those who direct their energy towards threats, violence and untruths: there are countless dogs like Lennox in the Pound, if you want to do something CONSTRUCTIVE then we strongly suggest you help them and lobby the government in the UK to abolish BSL."
Unfortunately for Ms Gunther, protestations about being onside with Lennox don’t hold water any more owing to the content of her blog.
Same goes for the ‘anti-lies and deception’ claims, which are laughable given her track record, particularly on the blog.
We couldn’t agree more with her final sentiment, it’s just a pity she didn’t take her own advice. All that time spent bitching about Lennox’s owners, blogging about it and posting on Facebook could have been used wisely and productively from an anti-BSL point of view.
Hello Ted, your completely unaltered comments are activated now. What, surprised?
Anyone who hasn’t commented on the blog before has to be approved, that’s to stop the odd airhead from Lem Thirteen or The Lav posting inane and childish remarks when we’re not around, as they’ve tried in the past.
We’ve also screenshot your comments so they can be covered better here, and you’ll find them below, although we’ve blanked out your IP address.
Looking at the overall questions, in a nutshell, the short answer to the whole lot is ‘You reap what you sow‘ Ted.
As we said right at the start, the purpose of this blog is to draw attention to things that have been said and done by members of the Hate Campaign. We’re aware you don’t like the term ‘Hate Campaign’, but it’s a step up from ‘Syco’, so not too bad in the circumstances and, in any case, it happens to be true.
We’ve also maintained right from the start that we control the topics and do not answer questions unless we feel the need, that’s our prerogative, and we have never pretended otherwise. As you’ve been reading the blog regularly in one guise or another, you should know that.
Also from the off we explained that we were not directly involved with (what you all like to call) the ‘core’ of the Save Lennox campaign. Obviously over the last few months we’ve become acquainted with many of them, in fact we wouldn’t have access to most of the evidence without them. That doesn’t mean we run a message service, so if you want to draw attention to any one of them directly, we suggest you do what comes naturally – use your own page, Deed not breed or The Lav, since they seem to be the only outlets you have left.
As far as pillow cases go, white or otherwise, nope, we don’t wear them.
The ‘abusive’ remark is subjective. You’ve all been exposed and caught red-handed, so from your point of view it’s a completely natural and expected reaction to make your accusers out to be the villains of the piece. It’s what happens when bullies and liars are confronted.
It’s pretty much the same as above in that you’re accusing your own personal hate targets of now being the bullies and abusers, and all because you’ve been outed. You’re backed into a corner so it’s fight or flight – a bit of both so far.
The KKK analogy is utterly ridiculous; they’re an organisation based on shocking and disgusting principles and your preferance for mentioning them every chance you get just makes it appear as if you share the same values. If you do share those values then fair enough, but at least spit it out and make yourself clear.
And ditto Comment 1 regards us blogging anonymously. You have a choice; read our blog, don’t read our blog. The time will come when (according to her) Mel Page’s solicitor and local police will have done their job and all will be revealed, including HC’s antics and hidden profiles. Until that day we can all carry on the way we are – the HC with more fakes than a mannequin factory, and us with our little blog.
In the meantime, clearing out comments on The Lav, deleting Tweets, closing down Facebook profiles and unpublishing pages, none of that will do an ounce of good any more.
Your wires are a bit crossed regards proof; take another look and read what we actually have said, and then take on board our ‘prerogative’ comments above. Oh and Ted, it’s best to keep in mind that we don’t care what you think.
The reason ‘why?’ is an easy one, we’ve answered that many times before and, if we ever doubted ourselves for a second, all we’d have to do is pop over to a Lem page (currently Lem Thirteen) or The Lav, or go through our cache of screenshots, to confirm what everyone except you and that very small band of malicious people can see a mile off.
As for insisting both you and Mel Page are innocents in all this and were never involved, that’s a joke. It’s completely false and you know it (link). Your constant need to explain yourself and comment on Lem Thirteen to rally the dwindling troops makes it very obvious that you’re really wondering what kind of proof we have and when we’re going to use it.
You should have thought about that long before creating fake profiles to pursue a hate campaign, under the delusion that you’d get away with it indefinitely.
What you both should have done was – well, not done it in the first place;simple as that. You should have thought about the repercussions. You can’t blame anyone else but yourselves; nobody ‘made’ you do anything.
This particular Teddy has an obsession with introducing the term ‘KKK’ (Ku Klux Klan) into pretty much every comment. Charming.
And, as mentioned previously (link), he either has an extremely short memory or doesn’t involve himself in the logistics of Deed not Breed because Ted Ismay states: ” ….DnB has saved the lives of hundreds of dogs over the past seven years or so and are still doing it, daily…”
All that saving must have occurred prior to 2012 then, because according to this comment posted on DnB’s Facebook page on Monday of this week (18 March):
So between the three of them (Deed not Breed / Bull Breed Advisory Service and EGAR) they’ve saved seven dogs in the last year. You’d be hard-pushed to add enough digits to that figure to turn it into ‘hundreds’, but no doubt they’ll find a way.
Ted also says ” DnB ask for no money, they pay for the full running costs out of their own pockets, they fund it themselves “, which is odd because Mel Page said something completely different fairly recently didn’t she?
Anyway, enough about Ted, although there isn’t much more we need to blog today, they’re doing all the hard work for us, and a fantastic job it is too. If ever we wanted to illustrate to our followers the infantile mentality of the Hate Campaign and, more importantly, the stark difference between them and other organisations and support groups, we could not, on any given day, have found a better example.
Before we go, just to remind everyone that, if you do look in on The Lav or Lem Thirteen, keep in mind they are all still there, regardless of the excuses that they cannot post for one reason or another. In fact they have so many fake profiles and aliases they’re running out of ideas. The latest one is Sherlock Homes, newly hatched, and the only reason they chose that name is they couldn’t spell Moriarty (can’t spell Holmes either). Okay, fair enough, that’s just nitpicking, and so is this:
We’ll go over the rest another time, but to leave you with an illustration of Debbie Gathercole’s version of ‘an adult’ and her alleged ‘disapproval’ of some disgusting things that occurred on their side of the fence:
Heather Jones of course. This sad, lonely and very base attempt at spreading the usual vindictive bile was ignored by everyone on that occasion, including the rest of the HC – it seems even they weren’t stupid enough to show support for the poison.
Since most are now convinced Heather Jones was a cover for Page and/or Ismay (well one thing’s for sure, the idiot is based in Nottingham), it won’t come as any surprise that the above ‘Never assume the obvious…’ page disappeared shortly after we posted » Connections « – at roughly the same time the Boycott Boycott Belfast page and all the Roxanne Summers‘ profiles miraculously disappeared as well. Must be coincidence.
Already covered in January (link):
‘Heather Jones‘ made one last ditch attempt to save face before throwing in that grubby towel:
Well no, don’t suppose they are, having been exposed as liars and fakes. On top of that most of the names mentioned in Connections felt the need to close, clean up or lock down their Facebook pages and Tweets, in some cases disassociating themselves from each other and certain ‘interests’. All that to avoid being incriminated, and all very much too late.
Here’s a small reminder why:
The condensed version found here: LINK
There are some connections certain members of the Hate Campaign are now attempting to hide, deflect, dismiss as hearsay or just plain ignore. As we all know, one of the main characters was hidden behind the profile of Roxanne Summers, and we know that two people used the Heather Jones‘ profile. Most of you have a strong idea of their true identities.
The main characters are:
Mel PAGE, Ted ISMAY, Melanie RUSHMORE, Andrea Williams PHILLIPS, Sarah GUNTHER, Sandie LIGHTFOOT, Kirsten LAWRENCE, Sam BELLAMY.
We probably should apologise re: the Ismay pic. This was the only photo anyone seems to have bothered to download, probably because it smacked of Karma, or maybe it was to illustrate a time when Mel Page foolishly used that image to make more false allegations (under her own name for once) by accusing Lennox supporters of jumping Ismay and giving him a pasting, when actually Teddie simply tanked himself up at the pub and came off his bike on the way home (or maybe it was Grab A Granny Night and Ismay came off worse).
And we’ve had to leave Sam Bellamy out of the above line-up because she doesn’t want anyone to see her full-on, which is fair enough (we’ve seen her). She prefers to stand in front of a mirror with a phone obscuring her face. So rather than abandon her completely, we’ve put together a little something on the off chance it might hit the spot because, for all we know, she could be related to the celebs below – it makes sense really, Sam was always very fond of saying she knew people in high places. In addition, like all HC members, Sam has never mentally left the bike shed at primary school, so we’re absolutely sure that, with her infantile sense of humour and hilarious turns of phrase, such as ‘kiss my arse‘ (oh, we do laugh), she will be chuffed to bits with our compilation. Bless.
Original HC members such as Mel Page, Sarah Gunther, Mel Rushmore, Ted Ismay, Debbie Gathercole, Sam Bellamy, Denise Day, Andrea Williams Phillips, Kirsten A Lawrence, Ann End BSL Roberts, maintain that by exposing their lies and involvement in the vendetta against Lennox’s owners, we are single-handedly responsible for the death of dogs owing to their involvement with Deed not Breed and EGAR. Rubbish.
What they really mean to say is they’re unhappy being exposed and should have been allowed to continue, unhindered, intimidating and stalking their targets and spreading ‘facts’ based on fabrications, conjecture and spite.
Apparently it’s never occurred to them that it was very unwise and reckless not to have considered the impact on their respective interests and reputations before committing themselves to such a vicious and personal hate campaign. You can’t fix Stupid.
Let’s remind ourselves that they alone, along with their friends Sandie Lightfoot and Peter Tallack, were ultimately responsible for Lennox’s death. Without Lightfoot and Tallack’s false testimonies and the Hate Campaign’s continued and unequalled libel and slander against not only his owners, but Lennox himself, there is no doubt in most people’s minds that the fight to save Lennox would have been won.
The following Hate Campaign Connections list is not exhaustive, and we are able to state as fact that the names here (real and otherwise) are all very closely connected. At least one of these profiles is an alias for another person on this list (those marked with an asterisk* are known sham profiles/covers).
Page, Rushmore, Bellamy, Ismay, Vermillion and a few of the others can also frequently be found using various ‘handles’ on The Lav aka LLAAV.
Roxanne Summers* (currently deactivated following blog entries – link) , Heather Jones*, Mel (Melanie) Page (aka Ann Banford), Ted Ismay, Sarah Gunther, Mel Rushmore, Debbie Gathercole, Sandie (Alexandra) Lightfoot, Mandy Endbsl Mare*, Sam Bellamy, Denise Day, Andrea Williams Phillips, Kirsten A Lawrence, Sarah Rands, Ann EndBsl Roberts, Jeff (George) Slough, Sharon Vermillion, Ruth McKinley.
There are two ‘organisations’ at stake here, EGAR (East Galway Animal Rescue) and DnB (Deed not Breed), and all because the founders/proprietors, or whatever they like to call themselves, could not control themselves and have been instrumental in a hate campaign against Lennox’s owners and close supporters for the best part of two years. Therefore they are the only ones putting animals at risk.
Roxanne Summers, Heather Jones, Mel (Melanie) Page, Sam Bellamy, Sarah Gunther, Mel Rushmore, Ted Ismay, Sandie (Alexandra) Lightfoot, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Andrea Williams Phillips, Ann EndBsl Roberts, Jeff (George) Slough.
We are truly flattered (again) to find the wording of this post has been copied to The Lav, aka LLAAV.
What’s that old adage about ‘imitation’? Ah yes – ‘the sincerest form of flattery’. Of course, with members of the Hate Campaign there’s also another reason – having constantly struggled to form an original thought between them, they like to ‘borrow’ things and claim them as their own.
Be our guest HC, we can afford to be generous 🙂
…it’s really not nice to bully and take the P out of people is it?…
Seems Debbie Gathercole’s priorities are more than a little twisted. Evidently she thinks stalking a target (yes, we know about that) followed by an intimidating phone call, then plastering the recording all over Facebook and the Internet, is very funny.
Debbie is now on the HC frontline, trying to muster support for deed not breed on behalf of her friend Mel Page, who is unable to promote herself at this time for various reasons. Times are definitely hard if Debbie Gathercole is all Page could muster to represent and advertise on her behalf….
Just to clarify, the unstable Debbie Gathercole is calling the dog’s owner a disgusting fool who ‘needs putting down, yep she needs pts‘, adding ‘hope you don’t drown‘, or that might be directed at the the dog, it’s unclear. Either way, it’s alarming.
The screenshot before that shows roughly what Gathercole’s numerous pages looked like before we posted Connections and chances are she was either told to clean up her act or elected to do it all by herself. All the nasty ‘C’ words have been removed, so now she’s all respectable.
At the moment Debbie is making herself very busy trying to push Page’s Deed not breed on a handful of Facebook pages dedicated to seized dogs.
However, if it turns out the dog owners have already chosen DDA Watch to assist them, Debbie carries on regardless and, in true HC style, tries to sow the seeds of doubt against DDA Watch, followed up with a plug for her mate Mel Page. Of course, none of this would be necessary if Mel Page had not been instrumental in conducting a vendetta against Lennox’s family and supporters. Hindsight can be a wonderful thing.
So this blog is abusive and bullying and Heather Jones is a saint and we hide behind fake names while Heather Jones is 100 percent real with no other aliases. Well ain’t she just a laugh a minute that Heather Carol Billie Thet Ted Mel Bitter Twisted Lemon JONES.
Let’s have a look at Heather Jones‘ real profile…
Heather Jones, that profile of yours looks so real. There’s sooo much anti BSL and animal welfare related stuff on there, took us ages to go through it.
Yep we’re impressed with how real it is. And would you just look at these…
Back to Heather Jones the real person who never resorts to personal insults when she can’t get her own way. So she never made up names for her targets, like Granny Thrush, cLiar, flange, and she’s never posted personal comments about anyone, and she’s never ensured that Lennox’s owners’ address and photos of their home were made public, nor has she listed their solicitor’s details in full, and she wouldn’t dream of accusing another respected solicitor of supporting dog fighting (got a ticking off for that one didn’t you Heather).
She tries her best to come across as sane and reasonable, but when she wants to spit nails, which she does regularly, she toddles off into another profile, although sometimes her identity slips her mind.
If nothing else, Heather Jones is a good faker, because here she is doing a sterling impression of a nasty piece of work by taking a photo out of context to suit a vile and twisted mentality. Couldn’t possibly be hers?: