And we remember those responsible for your death. Never to be forgotten.
And probably Farewell from us too. Job done (unless they float back up again).
In September 2012 we launched this blog purely as a means to expose a pair of sick trolls using the names Roxanne Summers and Heather Jones. Not being sure at the time whether Summers and Jones were real identities, we incorrectly referred to them as ‘she’ in the purely feminine sense. How wrong we were.
Though their behaviour – and that of some very willing accomplices – has been disgusting, this was only ever intended to be a brief and temporary taste of their own medicine, and for a while it turned into a hilarious pantomime with more dumb characters and drama queens than a series of TOWIE.
But in the end, sadly, it exposed the true nature of some vile people and the lengths they were prepared to go in order to harm one particular family, including a young girl, and ultimately an innocent dog.
Lennox would probably be alive today if it wasn’t for the hate campaign waged against him – all the time falsely disguised as ‘concern’ for his welfare – with the sole intention of destroying his family.
That hate campaign began first with Sandie Lightfoot, quickly followed by Sarah Gunther and Peter Tallack, backed to the hilt by their good friends Mel Page, Melanie Rushmore and Tina Delaney. After that, the rest of the dross attached themselves like leeches.
Admittedly we relished turning the tables, exposing their spiteful and often elaborate lies, and it was a pleasure to see them scuttle away, one by one.
Bullying is cowardly and mindless at the best of times, but it’s anyone’s guess what really possessed a twisted collection of morons to attack Lennox’s family. It could be boiled down to the poisonous Lightfoot’s personal vendetta against them, coupled by the family’s shrewd refusal to accept a self-promoting, disingenuous offer of help from animal-abuser and habitual-liar Sarah Gunther. Then came the corrupt testimonies of Lightfoot and Tallack (perjury). But none of that really explains why so many others climbed aboard the gut wagon to intimidate and bully Len’s family – and every single one of them did just that.
We hope that, with the invaluable help of our friends and supporters, we have managed to ensure that Lightfoot, Tallack, Gunther, Page, Rushmore, Phillips, Delaney and the rest of the Hate Campaign will always be remembered for what they are; vindictive, dishonest and cunning.
We will never forget you Lennox. In spite of – or perhaps because of – your tragic and wholly avoidable treatment and death, you will always remain a gentle and beautiful ambassador for all innocent victims of a BullShit Law.
And we will never forget you, sweet, gentle Fudge, unbelievably just five months old when seized and killed – yet another faultless target for callous, spiteful Jobsworths and Trolls, who saw you and your mum as another mark for their twisted malice.
Another year dear Lennox, and still BSL is claiming victims based almost entirely on looks and a tape measure.
Some unfortunate victims are chosen through the over-zealous, ignorant jobsworths of this world.
But others, like you Lennox, become the tragic marks of narcissistic, spiteful, deceitful, and often androgynous excuses for humans, with no other agenda than self-promotion and malice.
In your case, that ultimately back-fired on the grubby individuals involved in a disgusting campaign against you and your family. But it couldn’t bring you back.
So, even though we don’t believe for one second that you were still alive on 11 July 2012, having already been destroyed by Belfast City Council long before that date, today we celebrate your short time with a loving family and hope that you will always remain an ambassador to all victims of the hugely flawed, immoral and unprincipled DDA.
We also remember you sweet Fudge…
You were the innocent victim of a mob-handed, bullying, over-reaction of the cruellest kind.
Big softy Stitch is home with his Dad now, safe and sound, and has been for some time. There is absolutely no legal reason it can’t stay that way.
We all know Delaney likes to throw her weight around. It’s common knowledge she’s prone to making threats (going way back – hence the name change) and making life difficult for anyone who doesn’t tow her line or who she’s taken a dislike to, and that’s often made owners of seized dogs in the Newham area reluctant to complain about her conduct and attitude, once their dogs are released back home.
We’re told she was so unpopular with ex-colleagues they pushed for a promotion, just to see the back of her, and nothing appears to have changed.
It was for that reason, until now, we’ve also been reluctant to draw attention to the unethical and unprofessional behaviour of certain people who forcibly involved themselves in Stitch’s case, and the fact that his owner is a gentle, older man who has no access to the Internet – and therefore social media – makes it all the more disgraceful.
Five-year-old Stitch was yet another victim seized by a puffed-up, overbearing Delaney, trailing the inevitable camera crew for her stint on BBC Animal Saints & Sinners (archived). This short clip shows her confronting Stitch’s bewildered owner:
Yes, Delaney does inform Stitch’s owner that his dog can’t go to the toilet.
This man didn’t know what hit him. He was obviously confused and surprised, as anyone would be, with a camera crew and bolshy dog warden in his face. Desperate to explain, he tells Delaney the dog is his life. He had a better chance of getting sympathy from a slab of meat.
It’s anyone’s guess how this respectable and polite gentleman felt when they took his dog away and he went home alone, and it’s hard to imagine the thoughts going through his mind until he made contact with DDA Watch two days later. All because an arrogant, emotionally-devoid control freak, and wannabe police officer, is determined to have her five minutes of fame.
With her experience, Delaney could quite easily have gauged the situation, instantly observing this gentleman was not young and the dog far from a threat, and even though Delaney’s struggled with literacy in the past, there’s nothing wrong with her eyesight – she could have dealt with it away from the TV crew on this occasion, but that would mean she’d be off camera, not centre of attention.
Stitch’s Dad was forced to relinquish his best friend that day. He contacted DDA Watch two days later.
DDA Watch have given this account :
“The owner of a dog called Stitch telephoned one of the DDA Watch helplines on Thursday 1st May. He was relieved to be able to speak to someone sympathetic and began by describing how his five year old dog Stitch had been seized – Stitch was being walked by his owner two days earlier on the 29th April on his normal morning walk when he noticed police officers standing at the bottom of his street; he then saw police officers leaving a block of flats with a camera crew, he saw poles but no dogs. The camera crew then pointed at Stitch and Stitch’s owner stood still; he was approached by officers and a dog warden, the officers made a fuss of his dog who was wagging his tail in his usual friendly way. Stitch’s owner was then informed that his dog was being seized as a prohibited type of dog (BSL).
Our case worker volunteer explained the legislation and options available in detail to Stitch’s owner. Stitch’s owner obtained the necessary 3rd party insurance and a DDA 4b application was heard before the local magistrates’ court who ordered Stitch be added to the Index of Exempted Dogs within two calendar months. This court order was given on the 7th May; Stitch’s owner was very relieved when we spoke to him after the hearing and we discussed the process of exemption which now had to be completed within two months.”
Stitch’s dad explained to DDA Watch that he did not currently have the funds to pay for the Index Fee, which amounted to £103 including the postal order fee, nor did he have the £305 owed to Newham Borough Council :
“We (DDA Watch) discussed how we could put out an appeal for donations for Stitch, but first Stitch’s owner was asked if any of his family or friends could help financially, this is something we ask all owners in the cases we assist financially due to the amount of cases coming through needing financial help and the available funds at any given time, we also discussed with Stitch’s owner that he could also try contacting the Dogs Trust to see if they could offer him any help and he was going to ask Newham Council whether a payment plan could be arranged for the £305; once this information has been gathered we would then assess what was needed for an appeal, as we do with all our cases.
We contacted Newham Council and an Animal Welfare Officer emailed a photograph of Stitch taken whilst in their care, to us for our records and to help with fundraising if necessary.”
Just after that, Stitch’s owner sent off the necessary paperwork without the fee, which prompted a call to DDA Watch from a Newham dog warden asking if they were going to pay it:
“Stitch’s owner received his application pack from the Index of Exempted Dogs and completed the necessary paperwork and returned it via post to the Index, without the fee. DDA Watch received a telephone call from a Newham Council dog warden on the 21st May; we were asked if we were paying the £305 to the council for Stitch to be released. Our volunteer replied that we did not at this moment in time have the funding to pay the full amount needed, explaining that we often have to fundraise for each dog as they come through. “
And there it was – the Green Light for Page and Rushmore.
Delaney tells her best friends the fee hasn’t been paid yet – a golden opportunity for Page & Rushmore to take a swipe at DDA Watch and at the same time score points with fans and cronies, all at the expense of an elderly dog owner.
We leave it to you decide whether they thought they were intelligent enough to pull it off without anyone noticing they’d lied through their teeth, or whether they really are that Base and Nasty they didn’t care how it looked :
It’s common knowledge there is only one other voluntary organisation dedicated to assisting victims of BSL and therefore only one other organisation that will enter people’s minds. Page and Rushmore – those shifty, noxious excuses for humans, knew exactly what conclusion people would come to.
Surely even someone like Page would have realised how underhand and dishonest this looked, but she posted it anyway, arrogant and confident in the knowledge she’ll have the backing of her fan club :
The outrageous blatancy of that very public pack of lies takes some beating . We knew they were desperate, and we’ve seen the seething resentment they have for DDA Watch’s status and professionalism spill over on occasions, but it never occurred to anyone they could be so openly stupid using their own identities.
It’s very sad when resentment and jealousy have eaten away to the extent it seems perfectly acceptable to use an innocent man and his dog as puppets in a sick, vindictive game….
…sadder still, they paid the fee without informing Stitch’s owner either before or after. He had no idea they had gone over his head and that of DDA Watch, even though he was just a phone call away as far as Delaney was concerned. It’s not as if she was reluctant to use the phone!
That’s the fiction. Here are the facts.
“We know what we were asked for and why”
→ They weren’t asked for anything. Stitch’s owner didn’t even know they existed, so that rules him out, and if they REALLY wanted to help, Delaney would have got back on the phone and told DDA Watch the fee could be covered. Instead, almost immediately after discovering the fee would be delayed, Delaney gave Page the go ahead. They didn’t even bother getting in touch with Stitch’s owner.
‘At no point have we named anyone nor would we because funnily enough we’re not in the business of trying to discredit other people.‘‘
→ For starters, ‘at no point‘ did they name anyone because they didn’t have to, on account of there being only one other possible organisation. Obviously they already knew DDA Watch had the Stitch case covered, courtesy of their very good friend Tina Delaney, Newham Dog Warden, who seized the dog in the first place and was following the case closely, keeping Page updated.
‘The whole point of this was to help a dog and that is what we have done. THAT is what matters, not who paid for what. Again, huge thanks to everyone who donates to us and helps us continue doing what we do (smiley face)”
→ The ONLY point was grabbing the chance to smear DDA Watch and get the attention they crave, without all the hard, honest work that normally goes with it. THAT is what matters and only THAT. Their huge thanks to nameless people makes them look magnanimous and (they think) deflects from what they’ve done.
Needless to say Page and Rushmore‘s grand, selfless gesture elicited back-slapping compliments, with a few people being none the wiser and voicing genuine concern, while others like the conniving Day and Bellamy go along with the sick game, deceiving anyone else who genuinely believed the Page & Rushmore lies :
Page & Rushmore had a field day with this. With DDA Watch’s reputation temporarily (very temporarily – about two hours max) smeared, albeit with only a handful of gullible people, it was a good day’s work from their sick and twisted point of view.
The thread is still on Deed not Breed’s page, at the time of writing this. You’ll find the post by scrolling back to 22 May 2014 » Link
We know that’s probably left you full of anger and with a bad taste in your mouth, so we’ll finish off with something positive – the Truth from DDA Watch – an accurate, professional and very dignified response to the sick and twisted lies:
(DDA Watch post dated 22 May 2014 – linked to image) :
(Update from DDA Watch dated 20 June May 2014 – linked to image) :
Just a quickie to wish all our Friends and Supporters a very Happy Christmas.
In the New Year we’ll be going over something old and covering something new (worth the wait).
In the meantime, have a good one, stay safe and remember, Avarice, Resentment, Dishonesty, Malice and Corruption come at a price –
Toys? Well you can’t say they’re not mildly amusing.
Let’s have another look at the latest Lav deposit, and throw in a translation :
‘Waving Goodbye to the Turkeys’ :
Translation – “We cocked-up big time. So farewell one and all – circumstances require that we beat a hasty retreat.
‘This will be (The Lav’s) last post’ :
Translation – “This will be the last time you hear from us via this site… unless we decide to post again. But don’t fret, you can catch up with us any time on Facebook“
‘Yes, we are taking your toys away’ :
Translation – “Yes, Self Delusion is actually quite a nice place to be”
‘As you know we’ve been quiet for a long time until recently’ :
Translation – “As you know, we were forced into submission by Real Evidence and The Truth and therefore had no choice but to keep it zipped. However, recent uncomfortable events have forced us to take drastic measures so we’ve had to pop back with more Fantastical Tales of Woe, False Protestations and Twisted Logic, the latter of which we’ve perfected.
Obviously we know none of that has ever worked before, at least not with anyone of moral substance, but there’s certainly no harm in having a go, and besides, no one could begrudge us a last ditch attempt at saving face.
‘We achieved our goal a long time ago by shutting down the gravy train Craig Winters was riding’ :
Translation – “We made complete and utter Prats of ourselves trying to convince anyone who’d listen that we had evidence and proof of all sorts of nasty goings-on.
Unfortunately, we had neither proof nor evidence, because they didn’t exist and, although we knew it, our motto has always been ‘It’s always worth a try’ based on the knowledge that our followers and minions would accept anything we said, without question. However, we failed to take into account that our little Gravy Train would be stopped dead in its tracks”
‘We are .. sick to our stomachs watching a small group of 20 odd (very odd) people glorying in the abuse and celebrating the death of dogs’ :
Translation – “We are Pig Sick having to witness everyone condemn the very person we supported and lied for. And if that wasn’t enough, we did the same with Lightfoot and Tallack, and now we’re doing it again with Delaney. Well at least we’ll be out of it before that one hits the fan!
It’s easy for others to judge but none can understand what it’s like to be inflicted with bitter and nasty minds. We can’t help being poisonous and vindictive, so when we were offered the chance to jump on The Gunther & Lightfoot Malicious Bandwagon, we did what comes naturally.
But still, on the upside, along the way we found others just like us – Odious Androgynous Trash with the same warped outlook on life, so the experience wasn’t entirely wasted.
‘Karma is a bitch with a big smile. Yeah it certainly is Susan and those dogs sure deserved it didn’t they?’
Translation – “Karma really is a Bitch with a capital ‘B’, and we’ve been right stitched up by that flea bag. Never mind, we’ll try for some more damage limitation and twist Susan’s words to suit ourselves; take them out of context – it’s what we do best”.
No point in going over the rest, you all know the HC/Lav deflection processes by now.
But let’s not be too judgemental; the poor sods have struggled for attention and credibility, period, although it does seem a shame they’re going out with a phut rather than a bang.
Speaking of ‘bangs’, there appears to be quite a Big One heading South. It turns out Someone has been identified and, as we understand it, the details are currently being given the ‘appropriate attention‘.
Whilst we all await the Big Bang Deary, let’s all offer what may or may not be a final Adieu, Goodbyeee, Ta-Ra, Hasta La Vista, Good Riddance to The Lav :
MIchelle Delaney aka Tina Delaney Animal Welfare Newham
Probably not as fast as Page and Rushmore. To be fair, they’ve had prior experience.
On this occasion …
Yesterday we read a statement on the EGAR Facebook page regarding a court case in which the owner of the rescue had pleaded guilty to an 'error of judgement'. This was the first time we and clearly the vast majority of people had heard of ANY case against the rescue for any reason.
We have never had any reason to believe that there were issues with any of the animals there and had ourselves, along with many other organisations and authorities, sent several dogs to the rescue. We know the whereabouts of all of 'our' dogs and have been kept updated and know that they are fit, well and in good homes.
We have seen a number of photographs being circulated that were allegedly taken at EGAR. We took the decision to make no comment until official statements were released by both parties concerned. We understand that they were taken at an old block of kennels that had previously not been in use for a number of years and are located at an address entirely separate from the registered address of the rescue.
We don't know what happened, or why and we certainly weren't aware of any issues whatsoever prior to yesterday's statement. EGAR have rescued rehabilitated and rehomed hundreds of animals over the years, however the conditions shown in photographs released by the GSPCA today are clearly entirely unsuitable and shocking. We were only made aware of the legal action yesterday on reading the statement posted by EGAR themselves, and confirmed in today’s statement from the GSPCA We have nothing more to add as we know no more than anyone else and it seems less than some.”
No honour among thieves – they’ve hung Gunther out to dry to save their own skins. Well they’ve done that before as well [link].
Perhaps Gunther will return the compliment.
Page and Rushmore claim to have known Gunther for the past ten years but also say they don’t actually know her. It’s always a bit dicey making it up as you go along. You’d think Page would have learnt a lesson.
By their own admission, in the entire ten years, Page and Rushmore have never met Sarah Gunther nor set foot anywhere near her ‘registered address‘ (let alone the spare one she had up the road) and their only contact with her was virtual, via forums and other social media.
In their defence they say the PSNI and ISPCA also sent dogs to EGAR but, as we recently told The Lav, there’s no evidence to show that anyone inside the PSNI or ISPCA took part in the Save Lennox bashing.
So, having never clapped eyes on Sylvia Sarah Gunther, Page, Rushmore, Phillips and the rest of the HC, without any hesitation whatsoever, backed that woman to the hilt for years, including instigating the witch hunt of Lennox’s family, friends and supporters, entirely based on what Gunther and Lightfoot told them.
Page and Rushmore were certainly cosy with Gunther – a couple of months after registering Deed not Breed as a company in July 2007 (06325487), Gunther announced how proud she was to be a founder member of Deed not Breed Ireland:
In a (not-so) carefully worded attempt at damage limitation to their abysmal reputations, Deed not Breed ‘understand that (the photographs) were taken at an old block of (disused) kennels at another location‘. Well, that’s alright then, just so long as the dead dogs belonging to Gunther weren’t found at her ‘registered address‘! Not the most abstract, cold and stupid thing they’ve ever said in their defence, but not far off.
“This was the first time we ….. had heard of ANY case against the rescue for any reason.” Well, if you’re drowning in your own duplicity, you may as well go for broke.
We all knew, and so did many others, including Page and Rushmore, that Gunther had received a visit from the GSPCA in 2013, which culminated in the court case on 9th July 2014. In any case, it’s a foregone conclusion that Gunther would have covered her backside and told them, because she knew her secret was already out.
In fact, we covered it briefly in September last year – [ link ]
Make no mistake, Page and Rushmore knew about that visit and the court case, and they couldn’t fail to know she’d been raided before. So common was the knowledge that we even knew the court case had been postponed at least twice. We weren’t privy to exclusive information – it was out there.
However, it’s highly unlikely they knew what was really going on at EGAR because, as contemptible and conniving as Page and Rushmore can be, we don’t believe those traits extend to dogs in general (with the exceptions of Lennox and Fudge unfortunately), but the fact is they admit to relying on other people for testimonials about Gunther over the past ten years.
For someone they’ve never allegedly met face to face, they certainly did a good job of singing her praises, based on other people’s recommendations.
Why were they so willing to believe everything Gunther said? Either because they were more personally acquainted with her than they’re letting on or, more likely, because it suited their spiteful characters, which accounts for the close friendships they have with Lightfoot, Tallack and Delaney.
A better matched bunch of fishwives we’ve yet to encounter.
According to Page and Rushmore they always knew the dogs sent to Gunther were safe. Since they’ve never been to EGAR, how is that possible? Maybe Lightfoot told them after her visit south of the border last year, when she and Gunther orchestrated a photoshoot:This is the much-touted Bruce.
Fortunately for Bruce, Gunther used him as a cash-cow; a means to reap publicity and donations, hence the reason he is healthy and happy. Lucky Bruce.
Not so lucky this much-publicised foal:
Gunther wasted no time in using this little animal for her own purposes. After gaining lots of praise and adulation for her ‘selfless act of kindness‘ rescuing a foal the mother had rejected, she stuck him in a crate in a home with heavy smokers, several dogs, cats and Anyone’s Guess what else.
Gunther claimed the foal only spent time in the crate at night, and she had ideallic photos taken of him out in the sunshine during the day, but knowing what we do about this woman, it’s doubtful she spent much time attending to his needs.
He died shortly after that photo was taken. The cause of death – Respiratory complications.
It’s true that very young foals don’t do well without mum, and Gunther claimed he already had health issues. It’s also true that the mortality rate in rejected newborn foals can be high, but this little man had no chance in any event. He was another victim used by Gunther to gain sympathy and support, FOR HERSELF.
Gunther was never equipped to take on a sickly or orphaned foal. She knew that, but instead of asking for advice or, better still, refusing to take him on the basis that her knowledge and set-up was totally inadequate, she saw another chance to boost her warped ego and bank balance.
Which brings us back to Page and Rushmore‘s previous solidarity with Gunther. Could it be that Lightfoot assured them all was well and dogs sent to EGAR were in good hands? And would that be the same Lightfoot who got away with perjuring herself in court; the same Lightfoot who stalked Lennox’s family before and after his death?
Actually no, because Lightfoot met Gunther at a pre-arranged venue far away from EGAR’s location. In fact it was so random the Bruce photoshoot took place in a car park.
Similarly, Rushmore‘s husband Steve Rushy and his mate Ted Ismay had the chance to inspect EGAR when they dropped five puppies off in 2012:
Again, another pre-arranged venue, nowhere near the EGAR location. Five vulnerable puppies, just dropped off to people they didn’t know personally. They didn’t even meet Gunther.
A golden opportunity missed yet again – all that way just to get tanked up and bladdered.
On the one hand Page and Rushmore plead ignorance based on how unreasonable it is to expect them to know what went on at EGAR, and on the other hand they apparently have such strict principles and moral codes:
MIchelle Delaney aka Tina Delaney Animal Welfare Newham
The Lav is blocked, owing to a recent bulky flush – something to do with Gunther‘s not-really-secret Secret coming out.
Looks like the following screenshots are all that’s left of The Lav’s ‘We Love EGAR‘ :
(Sylvia) Sarah Gunther is currently more well known than she’s ever been, and the evidence of her behaviour you’re all seeing now was obvious to many long ago.
The present worry is for the animals left in Gunther’s possession, given that it’s very likely funding she pulled in by various means has probably now dried up (assuming she was spending all donations on the animals in the first place – in the circumstances it’s a very generous assumption).
Let’s sincerely hope something will be done about this woman, very soon, and that ALL the animals in her possession are taken to safe havens.
Going back to the screenshots and the hypocrisy of idiots writing on the The Lav, it’s unlikely anyone related to Save Lennox gave a toss about the attention Gunther attracted for her fake fundraising appeal (where’s the van?).
And it was common knowledge Gunther spent far too much time on the Internet (she never hid the fact) for someone who should be too busy running an animal shelter, which meant that all the time animals needed attention, she was on her own Facebook pages and in disguise on HC groups and pages, often into the early hours of the morning, leaving little or no time to care for the animals in her possession.
But isn’t it strange that The Lav should hide evidence of their support for EGAR and then complain that it’s unfair for Gunther to be accused of a previous offence with no proof? Now why should that bother The Lav if they apparently have nothing to do with Gunther or Deed not Breed we wonder?
Finally, The Lav would like to know why Page and Rushmore (Deed not Breed) are being criticised when other organisations that sent dogs to Gunther are not.
We’ll give them the short answer (long version coming soon):
Fingers are pointing at Page and Rushmore: a) because by their own admission they’ve known Gunther for ten years, sent dogs to her, and yet allegedly have never met the woman or visited her property; and b) because Page and Rushmore were the only people who conducted and took part in a very public hate campaign based on what Gunther told them – can’t say we witnessed anyone from the PSNI or the ISPCA doing that.
We’ve been asked to point out that Debbie Diane Gathercole (previously – among other ID’s – Deb Gooner Gathercole) is still telling prize porkies, often disguised as one of her many alter-egos, including Amanda Mare (mandy endbsl) [ very recently formerly known as Mandy Endsbsl Mare🙄 ], Robert John Gathercole and Hackar Gathercole, although to be accurate Debbie tends to borrow the last two when she’s been rumbled:
It seems a bit unfair really, drawing more attention to Debbie – after all, she’s not the sharpest in a box of rubber tacks.
We could almost feel sorry for her, much as we did with Amy Miller. It seems, just like Amy, Debs Gathercole is a compulsive liar and blissfully unaware she’s a joke.
But we don’t feel sorry for her, simply because Debbie Gathercole is a nasty, vile piece of work who once spent most of her day spreading lies about people she’d never met and knew nothing whatsoever about. Given half the chance she’d be doing it still.
Debbie Gathercole is an attention seeking brown-noser of the worst kind – someone who has been prepared to spread any vindictive rumour or tell any lie guaranteed to make her popular with people she fawns over. Principles and morals don’t get a look-in.
Some time ago Debbie plastered photos of her dogs to Facebook, then bellyached about one of them being lifted and used elsewhere…
No, she didn’t wind up in hospital, that’s another outrageous whopper, much like this:
So there’s Gathercole disguised as Mandy Mare explaining how coincidentally she has an identical life to Gathercole! She even has a character reference from Toni Rusenza (now Toni Maddison). You couldn’t make it up.
Debbie’s dog …
Mandy Mare’s dog …
Certainly is a small world.
Have to hand it to Debbie, she’s inventive, if not totally off her trolley – when accused of being both Mare and Gathercole, she comes up with these stonkers:
For someone who’s worried sick about her dog’s existence and past being made common knowledge – anyone, anywhere, any time can see all the photos they want along with ‘Missi’s’ history, right here:
Deed not Breed never ask for money, no siree, they just hide behind other people who do do it for them.
In fact there are a lot of things Page and Rushmore orchestrate without getting their warty hands dirty. But like we’ve said before, you require an excellent memory and a decent IQ to avoid slipping up, something the pair of them lack it would seem – they should have spent more time deleting ….
… much like Gathercole who, since this blog post appeared, has been busy deactivating accounts and removing certain images.
… and all victims of Breed Specific Legislation.
There isn’t much we can add to the sentiments for this sad day – the Save Lennox Campaign has expressed them much better than we ever could :
“ Heartfelt Thanks To Maria Daines (DDA Watch) And Kellie For The Lennox 2nd Anniversary Song & Video. Special Thanks To Barnes Family Friend & Lennox Campaign Supporter, Elle For The ‘Remember Lennox’ Logo.
Today, July 11th Will Mark Another Very Sad Anniversary Of Lennox’s Murder At The Bloody Hands Of Corrupt, Cruel Belfast City Council And Those Well Known Individuals Who Assisted The Council With Their Lies To Ensure Lennox’s Death And In Doing So Lined Their Own Pockets. ”
But we can remind ourselves that, along with an inherently corrupt local authority, the following repugnant and phony excuses for people have all, without exception, had a direct impact on Lennox‘s fate and/or were responsible for the shocking and malignant hate campaign against his family, including a 13 year old child:
We’ve covered these before:
Gunther has her own self-created problems at the moment, so for the time being we’ll let it simmer. It needs no help from us – she’s doing a grand job hanging herself without assistance from anyone.
But unfortunately and very tragically it has come to light that there have been many victims of her ego; animals that have suffered and even died, and alarmingly she is still in business.
No doubt she’ll change her name (again) and attempt to hide her past (again). There are only so many times you can make your past disappear.
Let’s also not forget The Witches Three:
More to come on them in the near future, not least because they’ve supplied dogs to Gunther (along with Lightfoot and allegedly Delaney).
However, if they could just get over their obsession with numbers or, to be more precise, envy of another organisation, we’d be able to let it drop. Since that’s obviously never going to happen (at least not until they find themselves swinging from a rope like their best friend Sarah Gunther), we’ll carry on.
We leave you with some more reminders.
MIchelle Delaney aka Tina Delaney Animal Welfare Newham
Hello Shankillway – as Summersdays hasn’t responded yet, we thought we’d fill you in, as it were, and also take this opportunity to update our visitors.
The Bar Council have indicated they will not be closing the complaint at this time as it coincides with Police investigations brought about by HC victims. As long as Police investigations remain active, any relevant information gleaned from them will be passed to the Bar Council.
Similarly, the information passed to the Bar Council was also given to the Police for their own investigations.
Apologies if that all sounds vague, that’s about as much as can be revealed publicly. If we were to publish material passed to the Bar Council and the Police, the investigations would be compromised.
However, rest assured that the matter is definitely ongoing and with so many people determined that Summers and Jones and all those associated will be exposed, it’s highly unlikely the matter will ever be dropped – certainly not as far as we’re concerned.
No matter how long it takes, sooner or later the past comes back to haunt in one form or another; mistakes are made and/or previous confidantes turn into enemies and informants.
Some of our previous posts including Bar Council information might be helpful:
To all our friends and supporters.
Wishing you a very Happy 2014.
To our Subjects, we remind you that nothing is forgotten; there’s no hiding place and sooner or later – well, you know the rest.
It’s just a matter of time …
To make better use of this blog, over the next couple of months we’ll be covering things like, say, how someone who wouldn’t know the truth if it bit her in the ass managed to qualify as a local authority employee, and we’ll be pondering the question ‘Do local authorities conduct thorough employee background checks?‘
On the subject of qualifications (or lack of), since it’s been such a big deal for HC members in the past, we’ll be looking at:
We’ll also have a Did You Know slot every now and then. For example, Did You Know That:
You’ve heard about people with names which mirror their professions, such as The Reverend Michael Vickers, neurologist Lord Brain, prison reformer Frances Crook, Constable Lawless, etc. Strange but true, but it isn’t confined to just surnames – did you know that it can also apply to locations; places where (some) people live?
For example, take NOTTS (Nottinghamshire), and then the homonym KNOTS, as in ‘tied up in knots‘ or ‘a knotty problem‘ :
Hmm, must be something to do with ‘cookies‘
Regular readers of the fake Heather Jones will recall that ‘she’ often referred to living in London, but knotted her knickers when one of the screenshots she posted showed advertising related to her real location (Nottingham), something we’ve covered before [link].
There sure is a lot going on in Nottingham:
A mere coincidence The Lav aka LLAAV is hosted via Heart Internet, based in Nottingham?
Well maybe, but if there is to be a moral in this post, it’s more about the tangled web of lies they’ve spun for themselves, rather than a knotty problem.
For instance, some people in certain geographical areas have recently gone to extraordinary lengths denying they are involved, in any way, with The Lav, aka LLAAV (some more material for our Guess Who slots) :
Denial is a pointless exercise for several reasons. For starters, there’s the mind-numbing primary school potty conversations among so-called (okay, self-styled) ‘professionals‘ which are uncannily similar to the juvenile, vacuous rants on The Lav, aka LLAAV, coupled with the HC’s almost unanimous attachment to the ‘C‘ word.
Then there’s the sick mentality that prompts them to randomly accuse people of being ‘stalkers of children‘ (go figure), and at least one of them will instantly brand you a ‘pedo‘ (he means ‘paedo‘) every chance he gets, for no apparent reason, other than that subject must be on his mind 24/7 – the same type of sick mentality that controlled the Heather Jones and Roxanne Summers profiles, among others – birds of a feather and all that.
(Which reminds us, where did ‘Angela Mannering’ disappear to?)
Finally, a word to our sponsors – we know some of you are worried (ah bless) that we spend too many precious hours blogging about your antics but, as we told Heather Jones a few months back (before ‘she’ was put out to pasture), on average it takes us about half an hour to stick a blog post together, sometimes a lot less, and that’s because you’ve been kind enough to supply so much material for us to choose from. So there’s really no need to fret. However, we’re not ungrateful, and your concern is noted and appreciated.
We thought it might be interesting, and revealing, to have a guess the author slot on the blog.
Original, uncensored screenshots will be posted at a later date, but for now we’ve removed anything that could identify the people commenting; the only clues being in the content and style of writing.
Apart from giving us the chance to make use of unused material and screenshots buried in previous posts, it’s a very handy way of identifying individuals through their writing characteristics without a false name diverting attention away from the real identity, but we’ll also add a few screenshot comments from people who have used their own names.
Apologies if some of the screenshots seem a bit ‘random’, there’s a reason they’ve been used which will become obvious when the authors are revealed.
The comments option on this particular blog entry is temporarily disabled.
Guess Who Pt I
1: This person was found stalking Victoria Stilwell, DDA Watch and the Free Lennox page on Facebook :
While we’re showing this, can anyone, anyone at all, please send us evidence that Lennox’s owners : a) ‘collected money fraudulently‘; b) ‘made accusations about dozens of people that are simply untrue‘; and c) ‘made threats, been abusive and harassed anyone who ever asked a question‘ – [link].
It’s interesting that this person offered to provide proof of those accusations only via private message and didn’t feel able to post it in public anywhere, at any time. Please bear that in mind when we reveal the author next week.
» » » » » » »
The same person who wrote that also composed this:
“It does not mean they are expert. Their evidence to the court is their opinion“!!
It doesn’t matter which one of the HC wrote this, it’s still a total contradiction of everything they’d previously agreed upon to say, but it suited this person’s vindictive agenda on that occasion to change tack (yet again). We’ll get to that another time.
For the moment, please note and keep in mind the final paragraph in that post.
» » » » » » »
3: We’re including this one not so much to compare styles of writing, more for the content :
We’ll cover what’s been said here later, but for anyone who hasn’t followed the HC campaign from the beginning, basically Terry Twoons was a fake profile set-up/used-by Sandie Lightfoot, and it disappeared darn quick! As soon as Lightfoot was rumbled in fact. More on that another time.
» » » » » » »
4: A warning to owners of seized dogs. If you upset certain members of the HC, don’t be surprised if you find yourself on the receiving end of one of their dirty tricks campaigns :
This person, and several other HC members, certainly did try their hand at ‘reporting’ Lennox’s family to the tax and benefits offices. Didn’t do them any good of course, because there was nothing to report, therefore no outcome.
Interestingly, some members of the HC were a bit shy about using their own names to do the ‘reporting’. Now that could be because several of them are on benefits themselves (Lennox’s family was not), or it could be they risked further damage to already sullied reputations owing to their complete lack of self-control.
» » » » » » »
5: One of our personal favourites :
» » » » » » »
7: How low can you go :
» » » » » » »
8: Two people commenting together, side by side on Victoria Stilwell’s page. Unusual considering one of them claims to have had nothing to do with the Hate Campaign nor the people in it up to their necks, and therefore that person surely wouldn’t be seen dead stalking Victoria Stilwell ? :
We’ve already wiped the floor with their Attorney General claims [link 1 / link 2] although to be fair it wasn’t difficult, and nobody took any notice of the HC prattling on about bomb threats and incendiary devices, because we all have Internet access and found out for ourselves what a crock that was. In fact even BCC couldn’t answer questions about their own accusations. But we’ll cover that subject in another blog entry as it’s something we haven’t touched on before. Besides, it will give us the chance to show more examples of the bile spewing forth from people who currently would prefer to be seen as innocent and squeaky clean.
9: Before we leave Part I, here’s another snapshot of those same two people, who had nothing much to do with one another apparently, but here they’re found commenting on one of their own personal Facebook pages. What a coincidence, not :
Guess Who Part II coming soon
Many of you have been on the receiving end of the Hate Campaign’s extreme malice in the past, and we’ve seen enough of their atrocious behaviour since starting this blog (in October last year, Kay!) so we know they’re totally incapable of being upfront and honest, nor will they take responsibility for anything unless it’s in their interests to do so.
We’re updating this entry first and foremost to apologise to the person we criticised for writing the comment in the screenshot below:
We’re apologising because we have discovered that the person who made that comment posted it on someone’s private Facebook wall.
In other words she made the comment openly; it was not posted to a page or a group nor intended to be taken seriously. On top of that, her comment was posted before Mel Page claims it turned up on a ‘secret group‘, a fact Page is fully aware of, which won’t surprise anyone.
The ‘mass reporting‘ being referred to was directed solely at HC members Diane End BSL Percival and Debbie Gathercole, a backlash following their double-act trolling sessions. The rest of the thread clearly shows its directed at Gathercole and Percival, something Page and Company do not want you to see. And yes, we have been sent screenshots of the whole thread, along with email notifications and we’ll be happy to include them here.
So when Mel Page claimed the screenshot they had just ‘been sent‘ was taken from a ‘secret group‘, she was lying, again.
The group Page is trying to pin that on was created last Monday (24 June) as an open group, and deactivated the following day. It was an unaffiliated group created purely for debate purposes. The admin had posted links to this blog and The Lav and clearly stated anyone was welcome to join and voice their opinion, whoever they supported. As you can probably guess, Percival and Gathercole were at the front of the queue.
So that group has nothing whatsoever to do with anything really, contrary to what Page would have you believe. But that didn’t stop her trying it on, again:
When will she ever learn. If she must lie through her teeth, you’d think she’d learn to cover her tracks. Heaven knows she’s had enough practice.
But the point of this Update is to show that once again Page’s attempts at damage limitation have taken her down to shabby and contemptible levels.
We should have guessed that Page and Company were up to something, but at the time we were shocked that anyone could suggest reporting the deed not breed page, so we thought maybe, just this once, they were genuine, and we were willing to give that a shot.
Page and Company knew exactly where that screenshot came from. At first we thought one of their lapdogs, Percival or Gathercole, had provided them with it, but as it turns out they didn’t have to, because the comment was posted to someone else’s domestic and open Facebook wall. That means Page knew exactly what the comments referred to, so she knew it had nothing to do with Deed not breed.
Page’s transcribed comment below. It’s difficult to look at the rank hypocrisy in her statement without responding, but we’ll leave that for picking over in the next blog entry:
“We have been sent this screenshot from a ‘secret’ group where a link to the website that has been causing so much trouble has been posted (this link is also being sent via private message). They are, as you can see making plans to either mass report this page or make up ‘fake’ cases for us. First of all, you clearly have no idea how we work. We would contact the police regarding ANY dog we deal with so would soon find out if a case/dog was fake. How immature, stupid and potentially dangerous your behaviour is. If you ‘mass report’ this page, we will continue our work as we have for years before we joined facebook. What you WILL do is potentially cause the deaths of dogs who’s owners come to us for help via facebook. I am disgusted. We both are. This is exactly the sort of crap we’ve been dealing with for months now.”
This particular Teddy has an obsession with introducing the term ‘KKK’ (Ku Klux Klan) into pretty much every comment. Charming.
And, as mentioned previously (link), he either has an extremely short memory or doesn’t involve himself in the logistics of Deed not Breed because Ted Ismay states: ” ….DnB has saved the lives of hundreds of dogs over the past seven years or so and are still doing it, daily…”
All that saving must have occurred prior to 2012 then, because according to this comment posted on DnB’s Facebook page on Monday of this week (18 March):
So between the three of them (Deed not Breed / Bull Breed Advisory Service and EGAR) they’ve saved seven dogs in the last year. You’d be hard-pushed to add enough digits to that figure to turn it into ‘hundreds’, but no doubt they’ll find a way.
Ted also says ” DnB ask for no money, they pay for the full running costs out of their own pockets, they fund it themselves “, which is odd because Mel Page said something completely different fairly recently didn’t she?
Anyway, enough about Ted, although there isn’t much more we need to blog today, they’re doing all the hard work for us, and a fantastic job it is too. If ever we wanted to illustrate to our followers the infantile mentality of the Hate Campaign and, more importantly, the stark difference between them and other organisations and support groups, we could not, on any given day, have found a better example.
Before we go, just to remind everyone that, if you do look in on The Lav or Lem Thirteen, keep in mind they are all still there, regardless of the excuses that they cannot post for one reason or another. In fact they have so many fake profiles and aliases they’re running out of ideas. The latest one is Sherlock Homes, newly hatched, and the only reason they chose that name is they couldn’t spell Moriarty (can’t spell Holmes either). Okay, fair enough, that’s just nitpicking, and so is this:
We’ll go over the rest another time, but to leave you with an illustration of Debbie Gathercole’s version of ‘an adult’ and her alleged ‘disapproval’ of some disgusting things that occurred on their side of the fence:
This screenshot appeared on Heather Jones‘ BBBBB page a few days back; it was then grabbed by a follower who posted it to our own Facebook page. Shortly after that BBBBB and Heather Jones (under that profile anyway) disappeared from view, presumably to tidy up that wall of hers.
Now we could be wrong, maybe the reason for Heather’s sabbatical isn’t about the AG email, because that would indicate she had fiddled with it in some way. If that were the case then she wasted her time, because she accidentally-on-purpose failed to ask the specific question mentioned in your own enquiry to the AG’s office (link).
In fact Heather Jones goes around the houses so much in her alleged enquiry to the AG, it’s doubtful Mr McConville would be able to figure out what she was banging on about. But if the email is genuine, then obviously he didn’t figure it out, because she got a standard answer to a vague question where she forgot to use names.
And speaking of names (or rather, the lack of them):
So maybe Heather Jones (who posts on Lem12 as admin) did fiddle with her email, because all she could come up with in response to our criticism is this BBC article from May 2012, reporting that Belfast City Council is ‘reviewing procedures to protect staff from abuse‘ (link)
Makes you wonder why they bothered with this article. It’s so random and desperate it’s impossible to see what they’re trying to achieve, and why they’re digging deeper into that trench.
Here’s the clincher; if an investigation had taken place, it was obviously not about who the HC refer to as ‘core supporters‘. We’re back to the football hooligan analogy again, or ‘a few bad apples’ – it could be about anyone.
But hey, come on, by no stretch of the imagination can anyone say an investigation was ever undertaken (slow legal processes or not) if Mr McConville himself confirmed it, in which case the HC are branding him a liar.
And why are they posting a random article as ‘proof’ when Roxanne Summers herself clearly indicated that proof of an investigation ‘came in confirmation from the attorney general’s office‘?
Oh dear, so many own goals and clangers the last few days, and daft Karin B Kulessa’s a bit of a liability as well isn’t she Summers?
A little quiz before we go, here’s part of another clanger. Answers on a (virtual) postcard who you think it is :
Clue: Fake profile with a common name, based in Nottingham. Hmm…
It’s odd that Heather Jones chose to display a DDA notice, bearing in mind we all know the Hate Campaign were themselves responsible for spreading negative rumours about the very reputable DDA Watch in relation to donations.
Here’s the original post from DDA Watch with full thread, something Jones conveniently omitted from her post:
Guess it must have slipped her mind to include that in her post. That’s what comes of having mainly air between your ears. Heather, you need to get the old BIKE pump out dear; stick it one ear and see if anything comes out the other side.
A Hate Campaigner’s job can be darn hard work. It’s not always in-yer-face and crass as you’re used to seeing on their pages. Sometimes, no matter how subtle they try to be with their muck-spreading, nobody pays any attention. So what to do next?…
Simple – you orchestrate, and who better to join you in a pre-arranged performance than St Denise Day, the Patron Saint of Hypocrites
So this blog is abusive and bullying and Heather Jones is a saint and we hide behind fake names while Heather Jones is 100 percent real with no other aliases. Well ain’t she just a laugh a minute that Heather Carol Billie Thet Ted Mel Bitter Twisted Lemon JONES.
Let’s have a look at Heather Jones‘ real profile…
Heather Jones, that profile of yours looks so real. There’s sooo much anti BSL and animal welfare related stuff on there, took us ages to go through it.
Yep we’re impressed with how real it is. And would you just look at these…
Back to Heather Jones the real person who never resorts to personal insults when she can’t get her own way. So she never made up names for her targets, like Granny Thrush, cLiar, flange, and she’s never posted personal comments about anyone, and she’s never ensured that Lennox’s owners’ address and photos of their home were made public, nor has she listed their solicitor’s details in full, and she wouldn’t dream of accusing another respected solicitor of supporting dog fighting (got a ticking off for that one didn’t you Heather).
She tries her best to come across as sane and reasonable, but when she wants to spit nails, which she does regularly, she toddles off into another profile, although sometimes her identity slips her mind.
If nothing else, Heather Jones is a good faker, because here she is doing a sterling impression of a nasty piece of work by taking a photo out of context to suit a vile and twisted mentality. Couldn’t possibly be hers?:
Roxanne Summers would have you all believe she’s a barrister and legal expert.
The evidence – Exhibit 1
Another vile, deranged and illogical rant from Potty Mouth.
We could go on about how a sane legal expert wouldn’t post such comments on a social networking site or a tacky website (LLAAV), but that’s stating the obvious and an insult to the intelligence of our supporters.
Apparently it’s the truth, the whole truth and nothing but, because Sandie Lightfoot says so, in her own words. Classic.
What? Caroline Barnes received a donation of ONE POUND STERLING (refunded!)? Scandalous! We just have two words – Melanie Page.
The only UK BAR Summers has ever visited is the alcoholic kind, unless standards have dropped dramatically. You’d expect a barrister to achieve a high level of education, and have more than a passing acquaintance with Latin…