Goodbye to 2015

Featured

And probably Farewell from us too. Job done (unless they float back up again).

Mel Page Deed not Breed, Melanie Rushmore Deed not breed, Tina Delaney Newham

In September 2012 we launched this blog purely as a means to expose a pair of sick trolls using the names Roxanne Summers and Heather Jones. Not being sure at the time whether Summers and Jones were real identities, we incorrectly referred to them as ‘she’ in the purely feminine sense. How wrong we were.

Though their behaviour – and that of some very willing accomplices – has been disgusting, this was only ever intended to be a brief and temporary taste of their own medicine, and for a while it turned into a hilarious pantomime with more dumb characters and drama queens than a series of TOWIE.

But in the end, sadly, it exposed the true nature of some vile people and the lengths they were prepared to go in order to harm one particular family, including a young girl, and ultimately an innocent dog.

Lennox BSL Belfast City Council Sandie Lightfoot, Melanie Page, Tina Delaney, Peter Tallack, Sarah Gunther

Lennox would probably be alive today if it wasn’t for the hate campaign waged against him – all the time falsely disguised as ‘concern’ for his welfare – with the sole intention of destroying his family.

That hate campaign began first with Sandie Lightfoot, quickly followed by Sarah Gunther and Peter Tallack, backed to the hilt by their good friends Mel Page, Melanie Rushmore and Tina Delaney. After that, the rest of the dross attached themselves like leeches.

Admittedly we relished turning the tables, exposing their spiteful and often elaborate lies, and it was a pleasure to see them scuttle away, one by one.

Sandie Lightfoot Lennox BSL Stalking EvidenceBullying is cowardly and mindless at the best of times, but it’s anyone’s guess what really possessed a twisted collection of morons to attack Lennox’s family.  It could be boiled down to the poisonous Lightfoot’s personal vendetta against them, coupled by the family’s shrewd refusal to accept a self-promoting, disingenuous offer of help from animal-abuser and habitual-liar Sarah Gunther.  Then came the corrupt testimonies of Lightfoot and Tallack (perjury). But none of that really explains why so many others climbed aboard the gut wagon to intimidate and bully Len’s family – and every single one of them did just that.

We hope that, with the invaluable help of our friends and supporters, we have managed to ensure that Lightfoot, Tallack, Gunther, Page, Rushmore, PhillipsDelaney and the rest of the Hate Campaign will always be remembered for what they are; vindictive, dishonest and cunning.

We will never forget you LennoxIn spite of – or perhaps because of – your tragic and wholly avoidable treatment and death, you will always remain a gentle and beautiful ambassador for all innocent victims of a BullShit Law.

Sandie Lightfoot, Peter Tallack, Sarah Gunther, Melanie Page Deed not Breed, Melanie rushmore , Tina Delaney

And we will never forget you, sweet, gentle Fudge, unbelievably just five months old when seized and killed – yet another faultless target for callous, spiteful Jobsworths and Trolls, who saw you and your mum as another mark for their twisted malice.

Fudge 5

Remembering all victims of BSL. We sincerely hope that, by some miracle, 2016 will see an end to this cruel, utterly pointless and barbaric leglislation.

End Breed Specific Legislation

To Lennox’s family, Fudge’s mum, innocent victims of BSL, all our friends and supporters, past and present, we wish you and your loved ones a Very Happy and Healthy New Year. 

To the Lennox Hate Campaign members, every last one of you, we hope that the stigma of your actions will forever stain your lives – it’s nothing less than you deserve.

 

Advertisements

2014 ~ Lennox Remembered ~ 1st April 2005 –

Featured

~ Appalling and tragic as it is, Lennox’s death was set in stone the day Belfast City Council ordered him seized, on Wednesday the 19th May 2010.

In fact many believe Lennox’s destruction was a foregone conclusion the day Lightfoot turned up at the family home days earlier (11th May 2010), compounded by Tallack’s involvement –  something he claimed was accidental because he ‘just happened to be in Belfast at the time[link]. Given the many times he’s contradicted himself and forgotten his own lies, it’s probably safe to say that his involvement was anything BUT ‘accidental’.

Peter Tallack, NON expert witness used by Belfast City Council to aid the destruction of Lennox Barnes

TALLACK

The mere fact that Belfast City Council had Tallack at its’ disposal is neither here nor there – BCC, with crony Lightfoot’s help, would have ensured the same outcome for Lennox’s fate and found others to do their bidding – after all, there must be other fake ‘experts’ out there dense enough to falsify evidence for a reward of almost eight grand (the ‘official’ fee given to Tallack as a NON-expert witness).

But BCC did have Peter Tallack as cohort to Sandie Lightfoot – the ideal amoral and dishonest double act.

We don’t feel able to legitimately include the ‘official’ date of Lennox’s death announced by Belfast City Council because it’s more than likely he was killed long before that day. Doubters should consider that BCC counsellors consistently refused requests by the family to say goodbye to Lennox; they ignored all of Victoria Stilwell’s offers to take him out of the country, and even refused Sarah Fisher permission to attend Lennox’s execution and take his ashes and collar back to the family.

Sandie Lightfoot and a very frightened Lennox BSL shortly after being seized

Add to that more Sandie Lightfoot lies, this time where she allegedly made a habit of visiting Lennox while he was incarcerated, when she supposedly drove miles out of her way to take him gifts and toys – all off her own back, out of the goodness of her heart, in her spare time, yada yada.

What a shame she was inflicted with occasional memory loss and on those particular occasions forgot to take her camera and/or phone, instead having to rely on someone else to provide a photo of a different dog to show her own ‘proof’ of Lennox’s wonderful life behind bars! [link].

Sandie Lightfoot Belfast Dog Warden, liar and stalker. Ann Banford aka Mel Page Deed not Breed, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Ella Kathy Wardley, George E Slough, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough, Jeff W Whur, Jules J Jules, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Lesley Mead, Mandy Mare aka Debbie Gathercole, Amanda Mare aka Debbie Gathercole facebook, Mel Duncan, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod, Peter Tallack, Ruth McKinley, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon I Vermillion, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas, Gunner Leigh, Tina DELANEY Animal Welfare Newham, Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham aka Tina Delaney, Lennox BSL Belfast, Save Lennox, PSNI, Bar Council Northern Ireland, Tina Michelle Delaney, Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Delaney BSL, Tina Delaney Dangerous Dogs, Tina Delaney Nature or Nurture, Tina Delaney Death Row Dogs, Tina Delaney Dog Attacks, Tina Delaney Dog Bites, Victoria Delaney facebook, Michelle Delaney animal welfare manager newham, Victoria Stilwell dogs, Sarah Fisher expert dog behaviourist, Nerdy Computers Limited, Andrea Williams facebook, Andrea Williams Phillips WAGS, Jeff Lewis Slough Rochdale, John Alan Wareing, Julie Bell Tattler, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day facebook, Ella Kathy Wardley facebook, George E Slough facebook, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough facebook, Jeff W Whur facebook, Jules J Jules facebook, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence facebook, Lesley Mead facebook, Amanda Mare facebook aka Debbie Gathercole, Mel Duncan facebook, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod facebook, Peter Tallack BSL, Ruth McKinley facebook Belfast, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon Vermillion facebook, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas facebook, Gunner Leigh facebook, Jacqueline Moth-Hag Jahn, ISPCA Gunther, GSPCA Gunther, Ted Ismay facebook, Samara Phoenix Edwards facebook, Andrea Phillips Mrs Dude Facebook, Kel Gunner Leigh facebook, Jayne Radziszewski Jeffrey Slough Crede Signo Dynamic Websites company number 06960098 registered address 65 rhodes crescent Rochdale Lancashire L11 2HU, Jeffrey Lewis Slough Little Angels Staffie Rescue,

But that wasn’t enough for this twisted and warped excuse – she stalked and intimidated her targets on more than one occasion [link], even allowing a photo she’d taken of their home to be used by her disguised Facebook friends to ridicule Lennox’s family [link].

Given what we all know about Lightfoot and Tallack, we end this post with a reminder that all the following were close friends or closely associated with each before Lennox was seized; all of them were on Facebook in one guise or another, and all of them supported each other to the hilt during the two year Hate Campaign – and nothing has changed :

Among others [link]: Sarah Gunther, Sandie Lightfoot, Tina Delaney, Peter Tallack, Mel Page, Melanie Rushmore 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Tina Delaney Newham, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Melanie Rushmore Bullbreed AdvisoryLocation: Belfast City Council Date: 07/04/13. Best pals Sandie Lightfoot and Tina (sometimes Michelle) Delaney (was Furness)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Remembering Lennox, His Family, and All Victims of BSL

Lennox Barnes, sad victim of Breed Specific Legislation, aided and abetted by corrupt, immoral Belfast Council employees. Ann Banford aka Mel Page Deed not Breed, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Ella Kathy Wardley, George E Slough, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough, Jeff W Whur, Jules J Jules, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Lesley Mead, Mandy Mare aka Debbie Gathercole, Amanda Mare aka Debbie Gathercole facebook, Mel Duncan, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod, Peter Tallack, Ruth McKinley, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon I Vermillion, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas, Gunner Leigh, Tina DELANEY Animal Welfare Newham, Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham aka Tina Delaney, Lennox BSL Belfast, Save Lennox, PSNI, Bar Council Northern Ireland, Tina Michelle Delaney, Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Delaney BSL, Tina Delaney Dangerous Dogs, Tina Delaney Nature or Nurture, Tina Delaney Death Row Dogs, Tina Delaney Dog Attacks, Tina Delaney Dog Bites, Victoria Delaney facebook, Michelle Delaney animal welfare manager newham, Victoria Stilwell dogs, Sarah Fisher expert dog behaviourist, Nerdy Computers Limited, Andrea Williams facebook, Andrea Williams Phillips WAGS, Jeff Lewis Slough Rochdale, John Alan Wareing, Julie Bell Tattler, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day facebook, Ella Kathy Wardley facebook, George E Slough facebook, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough facebook, Jeff W Whur facebook, Jules J Jules facebook, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence facebook, Lesley Mead facebook, Amanda Mare facebook aka Debbie Gathercole, Mel Duncan facebook, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod facebook, Peter Tallack BSL, Ruth McKinley facebook Belfast, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon Vermillion facebook, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas facebook, Gunner Leigh facebook, Jacqueline Moth-Hag Jahn, ISPCA Gunther, GSPCA Gunther, Ted Ismay facebook, Samara Phoenix Edwards facebook, Andrea Phillips Mrs Dude Facebook, Kel Gunner Leigh facebook, Jayne Radziszewski Jeffrey Slough Crede Signo Dynamic Websites company number 06960098 registered address 65 rhodes crescent Rochdale Lancashire L11 2HU, Jeffrey Lewis Slough Little Angels Staffie Rescue,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A Message from the Save Lennox Campaign:

On April 1st Join Us As We Remember Lennox On His 9th Birthday & All Those Past & Present Affected By Breed Specific Legislation. Help Us Spread The Word About Lennox’s 9th Birthday Campaign called,‪#‎EachOneReachOne‬ Aimed At Informing Others About Breed Specific Legislation.

To mark another birthday without Lennox we ask you to reach out and tell someone about Breed Specific Legislation as there are still so many still unaware about BSL and too many innocent dogs are losing their lives. Just like Lennox, these dogs are much loved family pets who have never harmed anyone or anything, their only crime was simply being born looking a certain way.
BSL is wrong, BSL tears families apart, the only way to fight it is to stand together and protest that enough is enough! We demand education not eradication, we demand deed not breed!
The more people educated about responsible dog ownership and BSL the many more lives can be saved.

On April 1st 2014 at 21.00 (9pm) UK time and 16.00 (4pm) EDT join the Lennox campaign for a special Twitter tweetstorm. Here are some ideas of how you can show your support and help spread the word about Lennox’s 9th birthday campaign #EachOneReachOne.

Turn your twitter avatar/profile picture black for 24hrs on April 1st, alternatively you may copy and use the Lennox campaign memorial ribbon avatar/profile picture from this Facebook page or from the @OfficialLennox twitter account.

Change your Facebook timeline picture for 24hrs by copying and using the Lennox 9th birthday memorial timeline cover from this Facebook page.

Update your own Facebook status with Lennox’s story for 24hrs.

Print out an anti BSL leaflet or use the one attached (What You Should Know About BSL) and pass them out in the street or park, ask a shop owner or pet store if you may pin one to a notice board or if you may leave a bundle with them.

We can all help educate others who may not be aware of BSL if each of us reach out and tell one other person, EachOneReachOne.

Lennox will never be forgotten because his spirit lives on in the hearts of his family and in the hearts of millions around the globe who fought for him. Lennox will be forever with us as he is with YOU every time you help others, rescue, adopt, shelter, speak out against cruelty and campaign for the abolishment of BSL. YOU are his legacy, YOU keep his spirit alive, YOU help continue what Lennox could sadly only achieve in death, YOU are Lennox’s Army!
Continue campaigning for truth, continue to speak out and NEVER allow your voices to be silenced no matter how hard it may get… Never give up!

Thank You All. X

Twitter Hashtags:  #EachOneReachOne ‪#‎EndBSL‬ ‪#‎LennoxLegacy‬ ‪#‎LennoxArmy‬

Lennox Belfast 1st April 2005. Ann Banford aka Mel Page Deed not Breed, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Ella Kathy Wardley, George E Slough, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough, Jeff W Whur, Jules J Jules, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Lesley Mead, Mandy Mare aka Debbie Gathercole, Amanda Mare aka Debbie Gathercole facebook, Mel Duncan, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod, Peter Tallack, Ruth McKinley, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon I Vermillion, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas, Gunner Leigh, Tina DELANEY Animal Welfare Newham, Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham aka Tina Delaney, Lennox BSL Belfast, Save Lennox, PSNI, Bar Council Northern Ireland, Tina Michelle Delaney, Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Delaney BSL, Tina Delaney Dangerous Dogs, Tina Delaney Nature or Nurture, Tina Delaney Death Row Dogs, Tina Delaney Dog Attacks, Tina Delaney Dog Bites, Victoria Delaney facebook, Michelle Delaney animal welfare manager newham, Victoria Stilwell dogs, Sarah Fisher expert dog behaviourist, Nerdy Computers Limited, Andrea Williams facebook, Andrea Williams Phillips WAGS, Jeff Lewis Slough Rochdale, John Alan Wareing, Julie Bell Tattler, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day facebook, Ella Kathy Wardley facebook, George E Slough facebook, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough facebook, Jeff W Whur facebook, Jules J Jules facebook, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence facebook, Lesley Mead facebook, Amanda Mare facebook aka Debbie Gathercole, Mel Duncan facebook, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod facebook, Peter Tallack BSL, Ruth McKinley facebook Belfast, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon Vermillion facebook, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas facebook, Gunner Leigh facebook, Jacqueline Moth-Hag Jahn, ISPCA Gunther, GSPCA Gunther, Ted Ismay facebook, Samara Phoenix Edwards facebook, Andrea Phillips Mrs Dude Facebook, Kel Gunner Leigh facebook, Jayne Radziszewski Jeffrey Slough Crede Signo Dynamic Websites company number 06960098 registered address 65 rhodes crescent Rochdale Lancashire L11 2HU, Jeffrey Lewis Slough Little Angels Staffie Rescue,

Polishing off

Featured

Our last post on this particular subject for the time being so we can concentrate on other things, unless of course they devise something else to blame us for 🙂

Just a quickie about something mentioned on Friday regarding Ted Ismay and his anti-paedophile groups. In a nutshell, Ismay made contact with a group admin and, in turn, that admin checked Ismay’s page, where he found the collection of posts mentioned in our earlier blog entry (link) and little else. In other words, there was nothing on Ismay’s page to indicate it was dedicated to anything other than the content of his warped state of mind.

Not long after that Ismay hid or removed all traces of his defamatory comments with the excuse that his kids were reading his wall. A strange thing to say considering he was the one concocting detailed sick stories which had been sitting on his page for some time, unless they’re used to seeing that tripe.

However, the admin did say that he’d passed Ismay’s details on to another group. We also understand from one of our followers that several similar groups and pages have now been contacted with a full explanation and links back to this site.

Mel Page and Ted Ismay have the morals of a gnat. As we’ve seen, they are prepared to say absolutely anything to deflect attention away from themselves, even to the point of dragging children into their spiteful games.

Their attempts at diversion reek of desperation and are so transparent it’s embarrassing, the same pattern of behaviour for all Hate Campaign members since their vendetta began.

So never mind Mel Page’s false claim of ‘guilt by association‘. With the disappearance of two major trolls, Heather Jones and Roxanne Summers, various other profiles and groups, even a child could figure out that Ismay and Page are in it up to their necks.

But, according to them, they have nothing to do with any of it; they’re entirely blameless, and yet Ms Page gives herself a get-out clause by saying she might have ‘retaliated‘.

They claim to be victims but they have fully supported and backed those involved with the HC in public from day one. That short memory lets them down every time – one minute they’re ‘guilty by association‘, then they’re ‘retaliating‘, and at other times just plain ‘innocent‘.

The fact that they have now removed comments, deactivated spare and fake profiles, wiped out Tweets and various other associations, is very revealing, but neither here nor there, since it was a waste of their time.

Time and again we’ve heard how the poor innocent things have been subjected to all kinds of uncalled-for abuse. There’s the ‘paramilitary threats‘ claim with no evidence to support it; the ‘I’ve been accused of threatening a child with violence‘, again with no evidence. Mel Page constantly refers back to vile threats and abuse, but no one has seen anything valid to support any of her claims.

And then there’s the incident where Mr Ismay allegedly took a ‘beating‘, altered and used against their targets. We know most people believe he either came off his bike or made himself unpopular with some locals and got smacked around a bit, but whatever the reason for his injuries, he and Page made sure that they ‘heavily implied’ Save Lennox supporters were responsible in some way for the alleged attack. Once again, totally untrue and with no evidence to back up their claims. Story of their life.

The ‘baseball bat threats’…

Mel page facebook starting the baseball bat ball rolling

Mel Page was the first person ever to mention ‘baseball bats and dark alleys‘ in the context of a not-so veiled threat (and there’s that mention of her ‘police friends’ yet again). When the people she named in that comment took exception and retaliated, Page swiftly changed her mind and it suddenly became ‘a wish and not a threat‘.

But putting that aside, the real thing highlighted in that screenshot is her obsession with Hate Campaign targets. She’s not observing, she’s taking part. In fact it wasn’t even ‘retaliation‘ on her part; it was a random comment she made about a subject she herself initiated. So much for ‘guilty by association‘.

As for the ‘Ann Banford‘ profile having nothing whatsoever to do with her, all we can say is, Mel Page should have quit while she had the chance on that one. It’s probably the most ridiculous claim she’s made so far.

But you have to hand it to her, she went the whole hog, insisting she knows nothing about any ‘Ann Banford‘, which is really odd, because that particular Ann Banford routinely posted on HC pages and groups targeting the exact same people Page mentions in her ‘baseball bat and alleyway‘ comment. What a coincidence.

In any case, that Ann Banford (with the same url address shown in the screenshot below) was a regular visitor to the very same HC pages Mel Page frequented all the time. It’s not as if she can validly say she hadn’t noticed Ann Banford, because there have always been just a small handful of HC members posting on those pages at any one time. Not exactly crowded or busy. Certainly not busy enough to miss someone commenting on a HC target

Ann Banford aka Mel Page aka posting a targets address

It’s plain silly to say she wasn’t posting under that profile, but apparently Page didn’t stop there. Bearing in mind Kathy Wardley’s blooper calling Larry Lawrence ‘Mel’

Mel Page aka Larry Lawrence outed by Wardley

: ……
Larry Lawrence aka Mel Page Facebook 1

Think we can safely say that’s not Mel Gibson in disguise.

Finally, a word on our non-existent attacks on Deed not Breed. That fabrication comes from the same mould as Mel Page’s claims that her kids are being stalked, and similarly she has no evidence to support the statement that we want to destroy DnB, because there isn’t any. She knows that of course; Page also knows that she is the only person damaging DnB, aided and abetted by the articulate Ted Ismay. Some free advice for the pair of them –  time to grow up.

We’re not sure what this is…

Ted Ismay Facebook on retired MOD officer and inferences of data bases leaks

Ted Ismay is definitely saying that a retired MoD officer is being stalked, but he’s also alluding to the fact that this particular officer still has access to Police databases. What could he possibly mean by that? We do hope he’s not insinuating that retired MoD police officer would consider breaking the law?

===========

In response to one or two enquiries and comments on Friday’s entry, and the subject referred to, we confirm that it is genuine information in the form of a Facebook conversation carried out in public (i.e. not in a private or secret group).

Yes, it would be considered damaging to the people involved and, although we will not refer to it again unless absolutely necessary, it will be made available to authorities who wish to see it, including those investigating on behalf of Ms Page.

And that, as far as we’re concerned, is an end to the matter, for the moment at least. If Messrs Page & Ismay wish to wile away some time responding, that’s up to them; good luck with that.

We stand corrected…

Featured

… because apparently Mel Page does not have a police investigation on the go (there’s a surprise):Mel page facebook has something to say to try and get herself off the hook

So, after seeking legal advice at least a month ago, Ms Page has only just been informed that her complaint is a civil matter, and it’s a no-can-do.

They didn’t tell her at the time, when she first complained and provided all her evidence, they waited until now to explain the legal processes. Why didn’t she ask her ‘Police friends‘? They could have told her the same thing ages ago. And it’s a mystery why her solicitor waited this long to explain nothing can be done. On top of that, at least part of her ‘complaint’ must have been made well over a year ago owing to her unsubstantiated claims of personal and paramilitary threats that have been floating around for months.

As for the fake ID’s, that’s rich – the next thing you know she’ll be claiming Heather Jones, a bunch of other Jones‘s, Angela Mannering, Billie Bennet, Larry Lawrence, twins Isabella & Nikola Black and even Roxanne Summers are all real !).

The only mildly savvy thing she’s done so far is use aliases, a Facebook admin and a ‘handle’ on the LLAAV website to post her bile, alongside using her own name to appear squeaky clean, which didn’t quite work out because she let herself go on more than one occasion. So much for having nothing to do with the Hate Campaign or any of its’ outlets.

Think we can safely say that Mel Page did not contact a solicitor or the police with or without ‘evidence’ for the simple reason that (as she knows very well) if something could be done about her complaints, her online activities would also be exposed, along with those of Ted Ismay. Page knows that in any police involvement regarding Internet crime, the track records of all concerned would be scrutinised.

As for the rest of that speech, it’s another crock again, familiar Hate Campaign stuff – the ‘poor me I’ve been caught out‘, ‘I’m the victim in all this now‘. They do it every time, predictable and samey. Well, Page should have thought about that before. 

But in one of her remarks above, the ‘I’m the victim‘ whinging has taken an altogether nasty turn with her accusation that ‘friends and children‘ are being targeted and stalked. Desperate and very silly. What ‘friends’ would they be we wonder, her Hate Campaign colleagues? And the ‘kids‘ someone referred to, they would be another person’s ‘dogs‘ right?

If Page insists on spreading lies accusing others of stalking and targeting her children and Ismay wants to chance his arm branding people ‘pedo’s‘ (below), they should be extremely thankful this really is currently a civil matter, otherwise they’d both be up Shite Creek with both arms tied behind their backs.

Mel Page and Ted Ismay are finally reaping the benefits of their malicious stupidity and should take their own advice;they seem to think they can say what they like…without any backlash. Not true“. As for their ‘bite’, it’s toothless.

Before we go…

Ted Heather Ismay facebook orchestrating his own demise

Ismay eventually removed that post. Maybe he realised that naming people he would like to think have a hand in this blog makes him look even more stupid than usual, or maybe it crossed his mind that taking yet another comment out of context, for his own very unhealthy reasons, was a bit too revealing.

The ‘kids’ he’s referring to are dogs, believe it or not, but Ismay thought or hoped nobody would notice. Besides, that lie came in very handy for his own sordid purposes to spread yet another sick rumour, in true HC style. (Ted has had his fair share of ‘mucky’ little conversations on Facebook in the past. Shame he has a short memory, otherwise he’d have steered well clear of accusing someone of speaking inappropriately in the same sentence as he mentions ‘kids’).

In the screenshot below Ted got cold feet and quickly changed the names of his victims to initials, but he forgot that the editing history of Facebook comments remains visible. Not the brightest bulb is he…

Ted Heath(er) Ismay Facebook correcting itself

PIB
A word of warning from the Hate Campaign – did you know that if you read one of their public Facebook pages, but you’re not actually friends with that person and that person hasn’t given you direct permission to look at their public page, then you are officially a Stalker? But if they do the same to you, that’s perfectly okay?

Donations revisited

Featured

We’ve been here before it’s true (link) and you all know we don’t need to spend too much time on this, it’s cut and dried. You also know (thanks to Mel Page) that we are being ‘investigated’, so it is our aim to assist in any way we can (after all, that’s why we’re here, although it doesn’t look as if that has dawned on them yet. Give them time, it’s only been seven months!).

For our most recent visitors, we’ll begin by stating the obvious, that the Hate Campaign have maintained, without proof of any kind (no change) that Lennox’s family received untold thousands in donations.

In fact the viper behind Heather Jones at one point concluded at least £60k had been collected.Heather Jones Facebook aka estimating againAs someone rightly said “Sixty grand, a quid for every nasty and vindictive thought that has ever run through the person behind Jones’ warped and tiny mind“.  

Can’t argue with that, although 60k vile thoughts for that ‘person’ sounds a bit on the moderate side to us, and it’s obviously not confined to thoughts alone.

The following is the SUM TOTAL of the Hate Campaign’s ‘evidence’ that copious amounts of cash was received in donations :

Paypal 2Paypal 1

This is an interesting one. For some reason they’re still using the screenshot below to back up their claims that donations were received(?), but as you can see it’s a £1 refund.

In fact that particular refund went straight back to the person who donated it, one Mel Page, who apparently only sent it to check if donations were being accepted so that she could go and report back to the other HC members.

That screenshot was originally provided some time ago by Mel Page for use on the various Hate Campaign pages and the HC website, LLAAV (affectionately known as The Lav).

So much for Mel Page’s protestations that she was never directly involved with the Hate Campaign

Save Lennox Hate Campaign LLAAV Donations 5

We all know Page is a main player in the HC; her reasoning behind this was to prove donations were being taken so that she and her HC friends could start the ball rolling with false accusations of a ‘donations scam’. Shame she wasn’t brave enough to make it a fiver, or maybe she assumed Caroline Barnes was as dishonest as she is, and wouldn’t give it back.

Page (along with her pal Gunther) also knows, from her experience running Deed not Breed that Legal Aid did not cover the expert witness brought in by Lennox’s family (see below).

The following screenshot shows a donation given by someone who at one time had a foot in both camps, and is now a fully fledged member of the Hate Campaign, Ann Endbsl Roberts:

Save Lennox Hate Campaign LLAAV Donations 4

And that’s it. That’s all they have.

This is what their whole campaign is based around. Let’s not forget Sarah Gunther also mentioned donations, she’s someone else who apparently has nothing to do with the Hate Campaign. For two people who are supposed to be detached from a vendetta against Lennox’s family, their names sure do crop up a lot in relation to the spreading of lies and gossip against Len’s family and the Save Lennox Campaign in general.

The rest of the HC ‘evidence’ is based on claiming that ‘someone‘ told them she was donating £200 each and every month, and apparently you’re all supposed to be daft enough to believe it!

It gets better – according to the HC, they’ve been contacted by absolutely loads of people who donated, but guess what? Every last one of those people has decided they don’t want any details whatsoever revealed, and so we all just have to take their word for it.

The best bit – the HC claim that the people who have ‘confided’ in them are so afraid of reprisals if they ‘tell’ (!) they won’t even allow the HC to give out rough figures without any other details. Not wishing to appear rude, but if you believe that you’ll believe anything!

And it doesn’t end there, they’ve accused Lennox’s owners of a veritable catalogue of crimes, including :

  • scrounging off the state;
  • of asking for help to pay for the expert witness when they apparently know it was paid for by Legal Aid (see below);
  • of receiving such whopping great amounts of money in donations, they bought themselves a new BMW, new furniture and two weeks abroad on a luxury holiday !

(For anyone conducting an investigation, we will be more than happy to provide screenshots of all the above at any time.)

It’s interesting that at least two of the accusers are receiving State benefits, when in fact Lennox’s owners were not, so it’s a bit rich to label someone else a ‘scrounger’, but as we said in Gunther’s post (link), how the hell could they know anyway?

Legal Aid and the Expert Witness
The Truth is that the Expert Witness was not covered by Legal Aid (but then they already knew that, and if the flotsam didn’t know it, the jetsam certainly did).

For the record, and as those people running certain organisations already know, the expert witness was paid by Lennox’s owners and, for a ballpark figure fee, consider that Peter Tallack received £7,500 from Belfast City Council for his so-called ‘expert opinion’.

No doubt they felt safe spreading gossip and lies hiding behind the fake profiles, and having their lies questioned and exposed obviously hadn’t occurred to any of them at the time.

Well, it’s certainly occurred to several of them now, judging by their ever-dwindling Hate Campaign numbers.

It’s a tribute to everyone else’s common sense that they haven’t really been challenged on this one before, which shows nobody gives any credence to their malice. But it wouldn’t do to let them get off Scott-free with their bullying and lies.

You have informed us that there was indeed a running total for donations placed on the Save Lennox website, which was approximately £2,500, but certainly nothing even close to the wild amount the HC claimed was received. That total was publicised much later in the campaign so by any stretch of the imagination it’s hardly likely to have reached enough to pay for the expert witness, let alone a new BMW.

Malicious minds produce malicious acts, and they really went for it with this one without one ounce of proof. 

Does Anyone Know…

Featured

…what happened to the Roxanne Summers profiles? It’s a mystery.

The main profile went very quiet after posting what it claimed to be a big reveal, which turned out to be a huge mistake (link). Shortly after that, we did some revealing of our own (link).

We followed that with Connections, at which point not only did all the Roxanne Summers profiles disappear, but also Boycott Boycott Belfast and the ‘real les trollops‘ WordPress site. Zapped, overnight, literally.

On top of that, several people mentioned in ‘Connections cleaned up their Facebook pages pronto and one in particular began the process of removing or hiding comments, Tweets and associations (too late, sorry Ms Page). Now why would anyone do that if they had nothing to hide?

Was it all because of our recent posts? The Bar Council’s response to several complaints about Summers might have had something to do with it as well and, as we understand Mel Page’s solicitor is reading this blog in order to gather evidence (as are the Police according to her), we thought it would be helpful to show this:

Bar Council Northern Ireland Letter response re Roxanne Summers Facebook

The attached letter from Kathy Smyth stated:

05 March 2013

Dear

Re: Professional Conduct Committee – Your Complaint Against A Member of the Bar of Northern Ireland

I have been asked to write to you on behalf of the Professional conduct committee regarding your recent complaint.

Enquiries have been made on behalf of the Committee and it has been confirmed that there is no Counsel at the Bar of Northern Ireland by the name of Roxanne Summers.

It does appear however that a person using that name on Facebook has represented that he or she is a barrister.

Two possibilities arise, namely;

1. The person operating under the name Roxanne Summers is not in fact a barrister and the representation is false, or

2. The person is a member of the bar but is not using their real name.

The Committee is making further enquiries to establish whether it is possible to confirm which of these possibilities is correct.

In the meantime, the committee would welcome any further information, which might assist in establishing whether the person in question is in fact a member of the Northern Ireland Bar.

The committee is due to meet again on 12th March and you shall be notified of any further developments.

Yours faithfully


Kathy Smyth
Secretary
Professional Conduct Committee

Needless to say we can post no further comments from the Bar Council at this time, but obviously that will be forthcoming when Ms Page’s legal team have completed their investigation, which hopefully will be soon.

After all, if they’re all as innocent and blameless of the deeds highlighted in this blog as they claim to be, doesn’t it make sense to punish us with legal action? If they’re truly guiltless it won’t cost them a penny, and our identities can be revealed. So what could possibly be stopping them?

We await to hear from them. Meanwhile, we’ll leave you with this thought. Why did the Roxanne Summers profiles, an HC Facebook page and a website disappear overnight, and why did various people clean up their Facebook pages and Tweets immediately after we posted the February entries mentioned above? Another mystery!

Feedback for Sarah Gunther

Featured

For the love of dogz by Sarah Gunther

»» Bruce :

“Our solicitor was Alison Douglas. She was committed and no nonsense. She cried with us when the judge ruled in our favour and was professional throughout the whole legal ordeal. She also helped with the last legal bill! She knows how wrong BSL is and went way beyond her call of duty to help Bruce.”

Fair enough.

——————————————————————————————

"Alison was the first solicitor Lennox owners had and she stepped down as their legal counsel only a few short months into the case. She was vilified by the owners and their followers and countless stories were made up. People forget or do not know that a solicitor can’t just step down from a case, they have to state their case as to why to a judge and obviously it was good enough for the Judge to grant it."

Yes, Ms Douglas did step down, and that’s because she was spreading herself a bit thin. Ms Douglas made errors regarding evidence and relating to the instructing of an expert witness. If the owners had simply dismissed her they would have been assigned a solicitor chosen by the court.

To avoid that happening, and to give themselves enough time to instruct a solicitor who would be more committed, the owners informed Ms Douglas they were aware she had made certain mistakes and she therefore took herself off the case. Furthermore, she was not ‘vilified’ by the owners, they simply told the truth. If others chose to ‘vilify’ her, the owners can hardly be responsible for that.

——————————————————————————————

"Since Alison was our legal rock for Bruce so why did she pack in the case? She must have had a very very good reason for stepping down and I am sure she will eventually answer the question when put to her."

Refer to our response above, plus enquire about a certain ‘conflict of interest’. Ms Douglas will no doubt answer that question when put to her.

——————————————————————————————

"Anyone who asked Lennox’ owner was told she hates dogs and is pro BSL – this we KNOW to be untrue, given our experience with her and the way she handled Bruce’s case."

Ms Gunther provides no evidence to substantiate that accusation.

——————————————————————————————

"Could it be that the very first assessor of Lennox for the defense stated that Lennox was aggressive? Why did the assessment of Lennox by Madeleine Forsythe never presented to the Courts? Could it be that Alison realised she had been lied to by the very people whom she represented?"

Madeleine Forsythe was indeed the first assessor. She was not known to, nor requested by, Lennox’s owners and was, in fact, brought in by someone else – we suggest Ms Gunther asks Alison Douglas to apprise her of that, if she hasn’t done so already.

In brief, Ms Forsythe assessed Lennox for over an hour (contrary to fabrications and gossip, she took him out of the kennel without using a catchpole) but her written report described a different dog and was dated incorrectly. Ms Forsythe was not allowed to be mentioned in court and therefore that assessment was not used.

——————————————————————————————

"YES, many of you have never heard of Madeleine Forsythe, have you? Lennox’ owners kept that one VERY quiet, aye?"

It’s evident from that comment Ms Gunther’s relationship with Alison Douglas isn’t as cosy as she makes out, because Ms Douglas would have told her that Madeleine Forsythe’s name and assessment was ‘kept quiet’ for legal reasons, as instructed by the court. Or perhaps Ms Gunther did know, but was just scoring another cheap point.

——————————————————————————————

As for the rest of that post, it’s hardly worth bothering with. We all know that Lennox was ‘deemed highly unstable and aggressive‘ by extremely unreliable and, let’s face it, very dodgy sources. Enough said about that, for now.

And then there’s Bruce, whose owners ‘cooperated’ with Sarah Gunther. In other words, they did as they were told and she got her hands on the dog.

——————————————————————————————

»» Statement re Lennox :

“HOW did a yard dog all of a sudden become a *therapy* dog? WHY had the solicitor dropped the case? WHY the need for donations when the whole case was funded by Free Legal Aid? WHY did the vet, who allegedly treated Lennox for hair loss, not testify, neither did the dog trainer they allegedly had? WHY did none of the neighbours testify on Lennox’s behaviour? WHY did the owner now say that her daughter was traumatised when the dog warden ripped the dog from her arms when she stated clearly in her email to EGAR that her daughter was in school?”

For starters, Gunther’s got a bloody cheek asking those questions. But considering she was seriously pissed off that her offer had been rejected, it makes sense.

As with pretty much everything the Hate Campaign churn out as ‘fact’, Gunther had no proof whatsoever that Lennox was a yard dog, that’s just pure spite; similarly the ‘therapy’ dog remark. In one instance on her blog Gunther is piqued because she wasn’t made aware of certain facts, so those facts she then decided were henceforth going to be called ‘lies’. Why the hell would the owners tell her what’s going on anyway?

The solicitor question has been answered previously, and as for donations and ‘the whole case was funded by Free Legal Aid‘, that’s another nasty HC lie, but quite how Gunther can claim to be privy to protected information is anyone’s guess.

Even if, as we all suspect, a certain BCC employee was leaking documents and information, she would not have access to those details. But, as usual, what the HC don’t know, they make up as they go along.

As you all know, there never was thousands and thousands received in donations, Caroline Barnes received only partial Legal Aid and David Ryan’s assessment was not covered by it. Anyone who says differently is a vindictive and malicious liar because there is no way those outside of the family, their legal team and people they choose to confide in can possibly have access to that privileged information. Not even a fake barrister or a dog warden.

The vet question is bizarre – why would a vet testify? Does Gunther think a vet would do that out of the goodness of their heart, and not charge a blinding hourly fee for the privilege?

The neighbours’ question is probably the daftest one to date, and she hasn’t shown any evidence for asking the last question (you can’t have failed to notice that, in spite of their claims never to bring the child into the mix, without fail they always manage to mention or allude to her in some way. Nice people.).

——————————————————————————————

"**The dog wardens attended on 19 May 2010. One of the wardens, Ms Lightfoot, attempted to examine the dog in the kitchen. The dog was very agitated, barking and growling. The dog lunged at her head and hit her with his muzzle. She was unable to carry out the examination because the dog was repeatedly lunging at her. The applicant finally agreed that the dog wardens could take the dog and she placed the dog in the Council van.**

It took her months to gain Lennox’s trust and she was the one who handled the dog when the assessments were carried out. This was used against her in the following hate campaign against her person. Absolutely ludicrous."

Regarding the day Lennox was seized, at one point there were five adults in that kitchen, four of them strangers in uniform.

Ms Lightfoot testified that ‘the Appellant’s kitchen was neither small nor crowded‘ but it’s our understanding that the kitchen is not large at all and is narrow in shape. In other words, everyone in that room would have been in close proximity to each other, and we don’t know of any dog who is likely to be comfortable in that situation.

However, regarding the ‘lunge’ (that word they love to use for greater impact) and Lightfoot being ‘hit on the head’ by Lennox’s muzzle – another dog warden who was present on that occasion, on being questioned in court, pointed to her chest whilst physically describing how Ms Lightfoot was hit, and the other warden didn’t testify on that question at all. The police officer had already left prior to Lennox being removed from the house, so that just left the three dog wardens, one of which couldn’t seem to make up her mind where on Lightfoot’s body Lennox had made contact.

It always brings a wry smile, whenever we see statements like this: ‘It took her (Lightfoot) months to gain Lennox’s trust‘. Visual evidence says something entirely different, with Lightfoot looking extremely relaxed and comfortable in Lennox’s company virtually from the off (e.g. link), and what Ms Gunther means by ‘against her person‘ is anyone’s guess, but chances are she’s alluding to the unsubstantiated claims of physical harassment again. Absolutely ludicrous!

——————————————————————————————

"Their own defence expert said in Court: ** On the other hand Mr David Ryan, on behalf of the applicant, in a report dated 16 March 2011 recorded that when he reached over the dog’s head to clip a line to the back of his collar in one movement the dog lunged towards him, growled, barked and snapped.**"

Covered previously (link). This is another example of how Gunther and the rest of the HC prefer to take quotes out of context or, in this case, accidentally-on-purpose omit the rest of the statement, which is: ‘fortunately the dog did not bite Mr (Ryan) although he acknowledged that it could have done so if it had wanted to.‘.

Mr Ryan’s own report states: ‘in one movement he lunged towards me, growled, barked and snapped. He did not make.contact with me and returned to sit with Ms Lightfoot. As he did so, I again offered him cheese, which he took immediately in a relaxed manner‘.

——————————————————————————————

 “The owner admitted in Court: **The applicant accepted that the dog was of the type known as a Pit Bull Terrier and that she was guilty of the offence of being the keeper of such a dog within Article 25A of the 1983 Order as amended. **"

Given Ms Gunther’s familiarity with BSL and court procedures, we’re surprised she’s bothered drawing attention to that. She knows full well the reason for the ‘applicant’s acceptance’ that the dog was type and, even so, her friends over at Deed not breed could no doubt explain the procedure to her.

But she’s pushing her luck expecting anyone to believe she’s unaware that agreeing with an assessment, pleading guilty to owning a banned type and cooperating with the courts would be the only way to get a dog like Lennox home, because it would then be based on temperament and, since Lennox had never had any complaints and no incidents had ever occurred, it should have been cut and dried.

Unfortunately, at the time, no one could have foreseen the likes of Tallack and Lightfoot making up stories about Lennox’s aggression, ensuring only one tragic outcome.

——————————————————————————————

And finally to Sarah Gunther’s bullet point Q’s:

  • ‘WHY was the petition signed by so many thousands never even presented to the Courts?’    Why does she think it wasn’t?
  • WHY neither, was any petition made to remove Lennox from the jurisdiction despite plenty of offers from various countries/organisations, not just EGAR.’   Already answered above.
  • And WHY the constant need for donations, when the whole case was funded by the taxpayer via Free Legal Aid?‘  Already answered above.
  • ‘WHY are there no pictures of Lennox in the house as an adult (apart from a badly photo shopped one)?’  What makes her think there wasn’t? How could she know one way or another, ergo why is she stating it as ‘fact’? And where is her proof the image was photoshopped?
  • WHY did Craig Winters aka John Winters aka Micheal Hunter threaten another well known anti BSL organisation with terrorist organisations and spammed the EGAR wall with vile threats and ridiculous allegations?‘  Where is Gunther’s proof of all this? And why didn’t she just come out and name ‘Deed not Breed’? If she has no real involvement in it, or anyone connected to it, as she claims, why be so shy about using their title? 
  • WHY did the owner never sent any treats or bedding to Lennox? EVER..?’  Another mindless and vindictive HC lie. So did this one originate from Gunther herself or is she just spreading gossip quoted by others? Where is her proof? Perhaps she’s referring to the dog a certain BCC employee passed off as Lennox claiming him to be so starved of toys a member of the HC sent him a few so the BCC employee could photograph the dog playing with them (link).
  • ‘WHY did they not ring the dog warden to enquire about their dog?’  Which ‘dog warden’? Would that be the dog warden whose lie was dismissed in court because her colleague couldn’t back it up? The same dog warden who said Lennox was ‘aggressive’ when she knew damn well he wasn’t? The same dog warden who was photographed outside the owners’ property when she was allegedly on ‘indefinite leave’? 
  • And WHY did he say in Court: *Ms Barnes’ partner told the dog wardens that the dog would “rip your head off” if approached**’. Ms Gunther seems to be getting confused with her use of the word ‘he’ (and so are we). She should ask her friends who were in court on a particular day what happened when Lightfoot testified that Craig Winters had allegedly told her ‘the dog will rip your head off‘. As those friends will recall, the dog warden who accompanied Lightfoot that day testified under oath that she did not hear those words and ‘could not recall them being spoken’. In fact that little piece of evidence from Lightfoot was disallowed. It’s probably a shame to burst that particular HC balloon but they’ve had more than enough mileage out of it already.

——————————————————————————————

Before we go….

"PS. NONE of us were against Lennox to suggest otherwise is ludicrous, we are, however, anti lies and deception. And to those who direct their energy towards threats, violence and untruths: there are countless dogs like Lennox in the Pound, if you want to do something CONSTRUCTIVE then we strongly suggest you help them and lobby the government in the UK to abolish BSL."

Unfortunately for Ms Gunther, protestations about being onside with Lennox don’t hold water any more owing to the content of her blog.

Same goes for the ‘anti-lies and deception’ claims, which are laughable given her track record, particularly on the blog.

We couldn’t agree more with her final sentiment, it’s just a pity she didn’t take her own advice. All that time spent bitching about Lennox’s owners, blogging about it and posting on Facebook could have been used wisely and productively from an anti-BSL point of view. 

Tied up in Notts

Image

Heather Jones Facebook posting from Nottingham. Now who else lives in a place like that?

Friday observations

Featured

As mentioned when going over the ‘Roxanne Summers’ profile (now deactivated), if you like to play judge and jury, it’s best to be squeaky clean. Allowing yourself to give way to hate and resentment tends to come back and haunt you sooner or later, but those now desperately trying to distance themselves from the HC have been too arrogant to believe that could happen.

Certain people have remained hidden behind aliases, either targeting victims on a daily basis, concocting stories, twisting facts, photoshopping images, making intimidating phone calls, contacting employers and creating childish names for people (or backing those who do), with the intention of degrading and bullying individuals.

They’ve pretty much had free rein to do whatever they please over the last two years. Now their stupidity is being exposed, they’re threatening us with all sorts. Well we welcome the intervention of Mel Page‘s ‘people in authority’ because, regardless of the consequences for us, her hidden activity over that period of time will also be revealed, and with luck she’ll drag the rest down with her. Not before time.

Meanwhile, just a reminder that any protestations of innocence are hot air. In fact only this week Mel Page contradicted herself in two different posts, one on Lem Thirteen (the page she claims to have nothing whatsover to do with, but to which she’s been inviting and adding people since before the Lem pages acquired numbers – now unpublished oddly enough!).

First Mel Page claimed not to know Heather Jones, only Roxanne Summers, and then she changed her mind and claimed to know Heather Jones but not Roxanne Summers. Confusing.

Mel page seems confused about knowing Summers and Jones 1

Speaking of Summers, it’s strange those profiles disappeared overnight, with no warning or explanation at all. HC pages often bow out with some sort of fanfare or feigned excuse, but not this time. Perhaps the Bar Council finally made contact with the person behind the profile, or maybe Connections hit a nerve.

So bearing in mind that Roxanne Summers and Heather Jones were fake and the people behind them still very much active, we’ll leave you with another reminder of their mental state, and let Mel Page herself do the introduction and set the theme:

Mel page Facebook claiming she's not a supporter of BBB

The comment above was posted on the now deactivated Boycott Boycott Belfast page, the page ‘Heather Jones’ forgot was supposed to be hers and the one Mel Page has ‘nothing to do with’ *cough* (link).

The screenshot immediately below is from one of the Roxanne Summer’ pages, with Mel Page drawing attention to a website she also claims to have nothing to do with:

Mel Page promoting LLAAV on Roxanne Summers Facebook page

Mel Page celebrating return of Lem Nine, currently Lem Thirteen Facebook

Mel Page NCG on Candy Rogers

Mel Page Facebook seems to like the HC favourite C word

Mel Page as Ann Banford and Billie Bennet targeting Craig Winters again

Regards the above, to confuse matters, Mel Page is also Ann Banford (her maiden name). Nothing unusual or wrong about that, except that it gets Page off the hook with her excuses about having nothing to do with the hate pages, because there she is, again.

Now this is where it gets really complicated because, as we all know, the Billie Bennet profile belonged to ‘Heather Jones’ (link), but ‘Heather Jones’ isn’t real so…..ah, what the heck, it could fry our brains trying to untangle that lot.

And here’s Mel Page or, more likely, Melanie Rushmore in disguise again as Larry Lawrence, only evident because someone none too bright slipped up:

Mel Page aka Larry Lawrence outed by Wardley

Heathers deep seated hatred

Roxanne Summers vitriolRoxanne summers you are filth

Mel Page NCG on Candy Rogers

Finally, sometimes amusing, but always disturbing (link):

BBBBB Heather Jones with her xmas marvelous and hilarious xmas ditty

Questions from TED ISMAY

Featured

Hello Ted, your completely unaltered comments are activated now. What, surprised?

Anyone who hasn’t commented on the blog before has to be approved, that’s to stop the odd airhead from Lem Thirteen or The Lav posting inane and childish remarks when we’re not around, as they’ve tried in the past.

We’ve also screenshot your comments so they can be covered better here, and you’ll find them below, although we’ve blanked out your IP address.

Looking at the overall questions, in a nutshell, the short answer to the whole lot is ‘You reap what you sow‘ Ted.

Comment 1
As we said right at the start, the purpose of this blog is to draw attention to things that have been said and done by members of the Hate CampaignWe’re aware you don’t like the term ‘Hate Campaign’, but it’s a step up from ‘Syco’, so not too bad in the circumstances and, in any case, it happens to be true.

We’ve also maintained right from the start that we control the topics and do not answer questions unless we feel the need, that’s our prerogative, and we have never pretended otherwise. As you’ve been reading the blog regularly in one guise or another, you should know that.

Also from the off we explained that we were not directly involved with (what you all like to call) the ‘core’ of the Save Lennox campaign. Obviously over the last few months we’ve become acquainted with many of them, in fact we wouldn’t have access to most of the evidence without them. That doesn’t mean we run a message service, so if you want to draw attention to any one of them directly, we suggest you do what comes naturally – use your own page, Deed not breed or The Lav, since they seem to be the only outlets you have left.

As far as pillow cases go, white or otherwise, nope, we don’t wear them.

The ‘abusive’ remark is subjective. You’ve all been exposed and caught red-handed, so from your point of view it’s a completely natural and expected reaction to make your accusers out to be the villains of the piece. It’s what happens when bullies and liars are confronted.

Comment 2
It’s pretty much the same as above in that you’re accusing your own personal hate targets of now being the bullies and abusers, and all because you’ve been outed. You’re backed into a corner so it’s fight or flight – a bit of both so far.

The KKK analogy is utterly ridiculous; they’re an organisation based on shocking and disgusting principles and your preferance for mentioning them every chance you get just makes it appear as if you share the same values. If you do share those values then fair enough, but at least spit it out and make yourself clear.

And ditto Comment 1 regards us blogging anonymously. You have a choice; read our blog, don’t read our blog. The time will come when (according to her) Mel Page’s solicitor and local police will have done their job and all will be revealed, including HC’s antics and hidden profiles. Until that day we can all carry on the way we are – the HC with more fakes than a mannequin factory, and us with our little blog.

In the meantime, clearing out comments on The Lav, deleting Tweets, closing down Facebook profiles and unpublishing pages, none of that will do an ounce of good any more.

Comment 3
Your wires are a bit crossed regards proof; take another look and read what we actually have said, and then take on board our ‘prerogative’ comments above. Oh and Ted, it’s best to keep in mind that we don’t care what you think.

The reason ‘why?’ is an easy one, we’ve answered that many times before and, if we ever doubted ourselves for a second, all we’d have to do is pop over to a Lem page (currently Lem Thirteen) or The Lav, or go through our cache of screenshots, to confirm what everyone except you and that very small band of malicious people can see a mile off.

As for insisting both you and Mel Page are innocents in all this and were never involved, that’s a joke. It’s completely false and you know it (link). Your constant need to explain yourself and comment on Lem Thirteen to rally the dwindling troops makes it very obvious that you’re really wondering what kind of proof we have and when we’re going to use it.

You should have thought about that long before creating fake profiles to pursue a hate campaign, under the delusion that you’d get away with it indefinitely.

What you both should have done was – well, not done it in the first place;simple as that. You should have thought about the repercussions. You can’t blame anyone else but yourselves; nobody ‘made’ you do anything.

Ted Ismay Facebook wants to know what we actually know about him b

They’re not happy

Well no, don’t suppose they are, having been exposed as liars and fakes. On top of that most of the names mentioned in Connections felt the need to close, clean up or lock down their Facebook pages and Tweets, in some cases disassociating themselves from each other and certain ‘interests’. All that to avoid being incriminated, and all very much too late.

Here’s a small reminder why: