Goodbye to 2015

Featured

And probably Farewell from us too. Job done (unless they float back up again).

Mel Page Deed not Breed, Melanie Rushmore Deed not breed, Tina Delaney Newham

In September 2012 we launched this blog purely as a means to expose a pair of sick trolls using the names Roxanne Summers and Heather Jones. Not being sure at the time whether Summers and Jones were real identities, we incorrectly referred to them as ‘she’ in the purely feminine sense. How wrong we were.

Though their behaviour – and that of some very willing accomplices – has been disgusting, this was only ever intended to be a brief and temporary taste of their own medicine, and for a while it turned into a hilarious pantomime with more dumb characters and drama queens than a series of TOWIE.

But in the end, sadly, it exposed the true nature of some vile people and the lengths they were prepared to go in order to harm one particular family, including a young girl, and ultimately an innocent dog.

Lennox BSL Belfast City Council Sandie Lightfoot, Melanie Page, Tina Delaney, Peter Tallack, Sarah Gunther

Lennox would probably be alive today if it wasn’t for the hate campaign waged against him – all the time falsely disguised as ‘concern’ for his welfare – with the sole intention of destroying his family.

That hate campaign began first with Sandie Lightfoot, quickly followed by Sarah Gunther and Peter Tallack, backed to the hilt by their good friends Mel Page, Melanie Rushmore and Tina Delaney. After that, the rest of the dross attached themselves like leeches.

Admittedly we relished turning the tables, exposing their spiteful and often elaborate lies, and it was a pleasure to see them scuttle away, one by one.

Sandie Lightfoot Lennox BSL Stalking EvidenceBullying is cowardly and mindless at the best of times, but it’s anyone’s guess what really possessed a twisted collection of morons to attack Lennox’s family.  It could be boiled down to the poisonous Lightfoot’s personal vendetta against them, coupled by the family’s shrewd refusal to accept a self-promoting, disingenuous offer of help from animal-abuser and habitual-liar Sarah Gunther.  Then came the corrupt testimonies of Lightfoot and Tallack (perjury). But none of that really explains why so many others climbed aboard the gut wagon to intimidate and bully Len’s family – and every single one of them did just that.

We hope that, with the invaluable help of our friends and supporters, we have managed to ensure that Lightfoot, Tallack, Gunther, Page, Rushmore, PhillipsDelaney and the rest of the Hate Campaign will always be remembered for what they are; vindictive, dishonest and cunning.

We will never forget you LennoxIn spite of – or perhaps because of – your tragic and wholly avoidable treatment and death, you will always remain a gentle and beautiful ambassador for all innocent victims of a BullShit Law.

Sandie Lightfoot, Peter Tallack, Sarah Gunther, Melanie Page Deed not Breed, Melanie rushmore , Tina Delaney

And we will never forget you, sweet, gentle Fudge, unbelievably just five months old when seized and killed – yet another faultless target for callous, spiteful Jobsworths and Trolls, who saw you and your mum as another mark for their twisted malice.

Fudge 5

Remembering all victims of BSL. We sincerely hope that, by some miracle, 2016 will see an end to this cruel, utterly pointless and barbaric leglislation.

End Breed Specific Legislation

To Lennox’s family, Fudge’s mum, innocent victims of BSL, all our friends and supporters, past and present, we wish you and your loved ones a Very Happy and Healthy New Year. 

To the Lennox Hate Campaign members, every last one of you, we hope that the stigma of your actions will forever stain your lives – it’s nothing less than you deserve.

 

Advertisements

We Remember You Lennox – 2015

Featured

Ann Banford aka Mel Page Deed not Breed, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Ella Kathy Wardley, George E Slough, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough, Jeff W Whur, Jennie Dhanjal Staffie rescue, Jules J Jules, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Lesley Mead, Mandy Mare aka Debbie Gathercole, Amanda Mare aka Debbie Gathercole facebook, Mel Duncan, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod, Peter Tallack, Ruth McKinley, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon I Vermillion, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas, Gunner Leigh, Tina DELANEY Animal Welfare Newham, Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham aka Tina Delaney, Lennox BSL Belfast, Save Lennox, PSNI, Bar Council Northern Ireland, Tina Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Delaney BSL, Tina Delaney Dangerous Dogs, Tina Delaney Nature or Nurture, Tina Delaney Death Row Dogs, Tina Delaney Dog Attacks, Tina Delaney Dog Bites, Victoria Delaney facebook, Michelle Delaney animal welfare manager newham, Victoria Stilwell dogs, Sarah Fisher expert dog behaviourist, Nerdy Computers Limited, Andrea Williams facebook, Andrea Williams Phillips WAGS, Jeff Lewis Slough Rochdale, John Alan Wareing, Julie Bell Tattler facebook RSPCA Preston, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day facebook, Ella Kathy Wardley facebook, George E Slough facebook, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough facebook, Jeff W Whur facebook, Jules J Jules facebook, Karin B Kulessa, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence facebook, Lesley Mead facebook, Amanda Mare facebook aka Debbie Gathercole, Mel Duncan facebook, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod facebook, Pam McCullough facebook, Peter Tallack BSL, Ruth McKinley facebook Belfast, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon Vermillion facebook, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas facebook, Gunner Leigh facebook, Jacqueline Moth-Hag Jahn, ISPCA Gunther, GSPCA Gunther, Ted Ismay facebook, Samara Phoenix Edwards facebook, Andrea Phillips Mrs Dude Facebook, Kel Gunner Leigh facebook, Jayne Radziszewski Jeffrey Slough Crede Signo Dynamic Websites company number 06960098 registered address 65 rhodes crescent Rochdale Lancashire L11 2HU, Jeffrey Lewis Slough Little Angels Staffie Rescue, Cooper & Co Solicitors Trevor Cooper Canine Solicitor Deed not Breed, Eddie O’Donnell Sarah Gunther EGAR Galway, Corinne Day, Barbara McAfee, Bernie Courtney, Robert Gathercole, Hacker Gathercole, Lennox BSL, Sandie Lightfoot, Belfast City Council, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Melanie Page Deed not Breed, Melanie Rushmore Bullbreed Advisory, Peter Tallack,

Another year dear Lennox, and still BSL is claiming victims based almost entirely on looks and a tape measure.

Some unfortunate victims are chosen through the over-zealous, ignorant jobsworths of this world.

But others, like you Lennox, become the tragic marks of narcissistic, spiteful, deceitful, and often androgynous excuses for humans, with no other agenda than self-promotion and malice.

In your case, that ultimately back-fired on the grubby individuals involved in a disgusting campaign against you and your family. But it couldn’t bring you back.

So, even though we don’t believe for one second that you were still alive on 11 July 2012, having already been destroyed by Belfast City Council long before that date, today we celebrate your short time with a loving family and hope that you will always remain an ambassador to all victims of the hugely flawed, immoral and unprincipled DDA.

Remember Lennox

We also remember you sweet Fudge

Fudge BSL Liverpool, Ann Banford aka Mel Page Deed not Breed, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day, Ella Kathy Wardley, George E Slough, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough, Jeff W Whur, Jennie Dhanjal Staffie rescue, Jules J Jules, Karin B Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Lesley Mead, Mandy Mare aka Debbie Gathercole, Amanda Mare aka Debbie Gathercole facebook, Mel Duncan, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod, Peter Tallack, Ruth McKinley, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon I Vermillion, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas, Gunner Leigh, Tina DELANEY Animal Welfare Newham, Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham aka Tina Delaney, Lennox BSL Belfast, Save Lennox, PSNI, Bar Council Northern Ireland, Tina Michelle Delaney Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Delaney BSL, Tina Delaney Dangerous Dogs, Tina Delaney Nature or Nurture, Tina Delaney Death Row Dogs, Tina Delaney Dog Attacks, Tina Delaney Dog Bites, Victoria Delaney facebook, Michelle Delaney animal welfare manager newham, Victoria Stilwell dogs, Sarah Fisher expert dog behaviourist, Nerdy Computers Limited, Andrea Williams facebook, Andrea Williams Phillips WAGS, Jeff Lewis Slough Rochdale, John Alan Wareing, Julie Bell Tattler facebook RSPCA Preston, Anne EndBSL Roberts, Deb (Gooner) Gathercole, Debbie Gathercole, Denise Day facebook, Ella Kathy Wardley facebook, George E Slough facebook, Jayne Radziszewski, Jeff Slough facebook, Jeff W Whur facebook, Jules J Jules facebook, Karin B Kulessa, Lasse Junior Kulessa, Kirsten Lawrence facebook, Lesley Mead facebook, Amanda Mare facebook aka Debbie Gathercole, Mel Duncan facebook, Mel Page Deed not Breed, Mel Rushmore Bull Breed Advisory, Pam Whitrod facebook, Pam McCullough facebook, Peter Tallack BSL, Ruth McKinley facebook Belfast, Sandie Lightfoot Belfast, Sam Bellamy Facebook, Sarah Gunther EGAR, Sarah Rands facebook, Sharon Vermillion facebook, Steve Rushy, Victoria Thomas facebook, Gunner Leigh facebook, Jacqueline Moth-Hag Jahn, ISPCA Gunther, GSPCA Gunther, Ted Ismay facebook, Samara Phoenix Edwards facebook, Andrea Phillips Mrs Dude Facebook, Kel Gunner Leigh facebook, Jayne Radziszewski Jeffrey Slough Crede Signo Dynamic Websites company number 06960098 registered address 65 rhodes crescent Rochdale Lancashire L11 2HU, Jeffrey Lewis Slough Little Angels Staffie Rescue, Cooper & Co Solicitors Trevor Cooper Canine Solicitor Deed not Breed, Eddie O’Donnell Sarah Gunther EGAR Galway, Corinne Day, Barbara McAfee, Bernie Courtney, Robert Gathercole, Hacker Gathercole,  Tina Delaney Newham, Tina Delaney Animal Welfare Newham, Tina Michelle Delaney aka Tina Michelle Furness Newham

You were the innocent victim of a mob-handed, bullying, over-reaction of the cruellest kind.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

End Breed Specific Leglislation

.

2015 ~ Lennox Remembered ~ 1st April 2005 ~

Featured

Lennox would have been Ten Years Old Today.

Lennox Belfast BSL Sandie Lightfoot, Peter Tallack, Mel Page deed not breed, Melanie Rushmore Bullbreed advisory service, Tina Delaney Newham, Sarah Gunther egar, Andrea williams phillips WAGS

Another year has gone by with Breed Specific Legislation having claimed so many other victims.

The only difference being, those victims were not the target of a vicious hate campaign by people with the morals and social skills of a gnat.

Last year at this time we concentrated on a Corrupt Council and a couple of Mouth-breathers :

 → 2014 ~ Lennox Remembered ♥ 

This year we ask you to remember that just because the vendetta against Lennox and his family happened in the past, it doesn’t mean it should be forgotten, nor does it mean that the people involved in it, even if to a lesser degree, should ever be forgotten for their part in the cowardly bullying of a family, including a young child.

The worst offenders, excluding Lightfoot and Tallack, hiding behind various aliases were:

Rushmore, Page, Philips, Delaney, Gunther

L to R:   Melanie RUSHMORE Bullbreed Advisory; Mel PAGE (aka Heather Jones / Ann Banford) Deed not Breed; Andrea PHILLIPS WAGS / Deed not Breed; Tina (sometimes Michelle) DELANEY (Furness); Sarah GUNTHER

The fact Lightfoot uses a tape measure to ‘type’ apparently is a great source of amusement to these charmers. No need to try and illustrate their sick mentality with words, they do that very nicely all on their own:

Sandie Lightfoot Belfast Dog Warden Fifty Shades

That particular post was aimed at Lennox’s family and their supporters and Fudge’s mum.


Lennox BSL Belfast


FUDGE

Today we also remember Fudge, another sweet and gentle girl, another tragic victim of BSL and another innocent target for the Anti-Save Lennox Hate Campaign. 

RIP Fudge

Fudge, victim of BSL


ZIMMY

And finally, we would like to extend sincere and deepest sympathy to Zimmy’s family.

RIP Zimmy

ZIMMY

Stranger to the TRUTH

Featured

You could say that Sandie Lightfoot’s involvement in the Save Lennox Hate Campaign actually began on 11th May 2010 when she paid a visit to Lennox’s owner.

Lightfoot initially made a statement under oath that, when she arrived at Lennox’s home on that day, she was sworn at and told the dog would “rip your head off“. She also claimed the door was slammed in her face.

However, Sandie Lightfoot was accompanied by a colleague on 11th May 2010 (name withheld). That same colleague testified in court that she “did not recall” and was “not aware” that the words “the dog will rip your head off” had been spoken, nor did she recall any swearing taking place, or a door being slammed in anyone’s face.

Subsequently the Judge ordered that neither Lightfoot nor the Belfast City Council legal team could mention that doorstep visit again. In other words, it was to be disregarded through lack of reliable and consistent evidence – in civvy speak, it was ‘a pack of lies‘.

So Lightfoot attempted to lie under oath and got away with it, by the skin of her teeth. It wasn’t the first time, and certainly not the last, as we know:

The following is a copy of a statement given to the legal representatives of Lennox’s owners, relating to the visit by dog warden Sandie Lightfoot and her colleague to the family home on 11th May 2010:

 Sandie Lightfoot turned up with another dog warden and asked if the owner (of Lennox) was at home.

As I’d already had a visit from the other dog warden a couple of days before, Sandie Lightfoot knew that my partner Caroline (Barnes) was in hospital, because I’d told the other dog warden previously that Caroline would be in hospital for several days. At the time that dog warden accepted my explanation and said she would come back when Caroline was out of hospital. There was no rudeness, we were both polite to one another.

Lightfoot and the other dog warden turned up before Caroline was out of hospital. Lightfoot asked if the owner was at home but she already knew that Caroline wasn’t, because I’d already told the other dog warden a couple of days before. So I explained again that Caroline would be out in a couple of days, and the other dog warden gestured towards Lightfoot and said “Yes, I told Sandie that”. So Lightfoot already knew that Caroline wouldn’t be there.

Lightfoot said “Well we really need to get access to the dog”

I said “I was just on my way out to the hospital when you called and anyway I didn’t expect you. Why exactly do you need to see the dog or owner, is there something wrong?”

Lightfoot: “Well we would really need to talk to the registered owner about that”

I said: “If there is something wrong, I can pass the message on?”

Lightfoot: “Do you have paperwork for the dogs here?”

I said: “Do you mean licence and stuff? Yeah we have paperwork for all three”

Lightfoot: “I’d need to see it”

I said: “That’s no problem but like I said, it’s my partner who takes care of all that and she has everything in one big envelope somewhere and I’m on my way out, so you’d really need to call back when she’s home, in just a couple of days”

Lightfoot: “Actually I’d really need to see the dog and paperwork today”

I said: “Which dog?”

Lightfoot: “You have an American bull dog?”

I said: “Yes we have an American bull dog cross, a Yorkie and a Boxer”

Lightfoot: “Just the three dogs then?”

I said: “At the moment, yes, but we have foster dogs from time to time. Why, is there something wrong with us fostering or something?”

Lightfoot: “No, we need to see the bull cross”

I said: “Like I said, that’s no bother but I’m on my way to hospital to be with my partner as she’s ill in hospital, but when she’s home you can call back and see him then, no problem”

Lightfoot: “Well if you refuse us entry to see the dog we’ll have to get a warrant and seize it from the premises”

I said: “Why would you need to get a warrant, no one is refusing you entry?”

Lightfoot: “Sure you won’t let us see the dog now?”

I said: “I’m not refusing you entry now, I’m just on my way out and haven’t the time now, and as you haven’t yet told me what’s wrong anyway, then I don’t see why I need to give you access. I told you to call back when my partner’s home from hospital and you can see the dogs and all their paperwork”

Lightfoot: “So you’re not refusing us entry but you’re just not letting us see the dog right now?”

I said: “That’s correct. Come back in a couple of days”

Lightfoot: “Ok, we’ll just get a warrant then”

I said: “What, are you serious? I just said to call back when my partner’s home from hospital and you can see the dogs. Listen, what exactly is this about?”

Lightfoot and her colleague start to walk towards the gate.

I said: “Do you want to tell me what this is about so I can tell my partner?”

Lightfoot: “No, we’ll just get a warrant and come back, seeing as we’ve been refused entry”

I said: “You haven’t been refused anything, but you know what, if you’re going to have an attitude like that when you come to someone’s door, then you can go get your warrant”

Lightfoot smiled sarcastically and closed the gate.

So that was the first time I had ever seen Lightfoot and at no point was there any swearing. Her colleague stated in court that I never swore and she also said she didn’t hear me say Lennox would ‘rip your head off’.

Seriously, who in their right mind would say to dog wardens at your own front door ‘oh, my dog would rip your head off”?

What I have said here is almost word for word of what happened on that day at our door, and I know this well because I’ve written it down for the solicitor and barrister many times and now it’s branded in my mind. The fact is there was no swearing by either party. But yes, Lightfoot did arrive at my door with a nasty and unprofessional attitude.   

the Privy…

Featured

aka The Lav (LLAAV) is currently undergoing maintenance and therefore not open to the public right now, so we’ll all just have to cross our legs while they clean up.

From what we can gather ‘Bill’ had a bad case of the Trots and clogged their sewer:

The Lav aka LLAAV Foot in mouth or bad case of the trots

Well nobody could ever accuse them of being too bright or thinking things through first.

‘Bill’ thought it would be a good idea to draw attention to ‘his’ friend with the murky, mysterious past, Sarah Gunther, by way of some obscure little tweets from NI Jackal (@NIJackal) on the official Lennox twitter – tweets so obscure, in fact, most people didn’t know about them until ‘Bill’ made them public on The Lav.

Not the best move, especially as NI Jackal is a bit of a twit, but a twit with information in that instance (well, it’s hardly a secret now is it?!)….

D Ferris Q to EGAR

EGAR Diane Ferris comment on Egar website guestbook

And to top it off, ‘Enlightened‘ asks to be reminded why ‘Lennox isn’t safe at Egar‘ !

GUESS WHO

Featured

We thought it might be interesting, and revealing, to have a guess the author slot on the blog.

Original, uncensored screenshots will be posted at a later date, but for now we’ve removed anything that could identify the people commenting; the only clues being in the content and style of writing.

Apart from giving us the chance to make use of unused material and screenshots buried in previous posts, it’s a very handy way of identifying individuals through their writing characteristics without a false name diverting attention away from the real identity, but we’ll also add a few screenshot comments from people who have used their own names.

Apologies if some of the screenshots seem a bit ‘random’, there’s a reason they’ve been used which will become obvious when the authors are revealed.

The comments option on this particular blog entry is temporarily disabled.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Guess Who Pt I

1:   This person was found stalking Victoria Stilwell, DDA Watch and the Free Lennox page on Facebook :

Which FOUNDING member of The Save Lennox HATE CAMPAIGN is this

While we’re showing this, can anyone, anyone at all, please send us evidence that Lennox’s owners :  a) ‘collected money fraudulently‘;  b) ‘made accusations about dozens of people that are simply untrue‘;  and c) ‘made threats, been abusive and harassed anyone who ever asked a question‘ – [link].

It’s interesting that this person offered to provide proof of those accusations only via private message and didn’t feel able to post it in public anywhere, at any time.  Please bear that in mind when we reveal the author next week.

» » » » » » »

2:    Someone who apparently knows everything there is to know about Deed not breed – in fact you’d swear they had a vested interest :Guess who this is with an awful lot of knowledge about Deed not Breed

The same person who wrote that also composed this:

Guess who is slagging off Victoria Stilwell, Again

It does not mean they are expert. Their evidence to the court is their opinion“!! 🙂

It doesn’t matter which one of the HC wrote this, it’s still a total contradiction of everything they’d previously agreed upon to say, but it suited this person’s vindictive agenda on that occasion to change tack (yet again). We’ll get to that another time.

For the moment, please note and keep in mind the final paragraph in that post.

» » » » » » »

3:    We’re including this one not so much to compare styles of writing, more for the content :

Guess who is dropping Lightfoot and Page right in it

We’ll cover what’s been said here later, but for anyone who hasn’t followed the HC campaign from the beginning, basically Terry Twoons was a fake profile set-up/used-by Sandie Lightfoot, and it disappeared darn quick! As soon as Lightfoot was rumbled in fact. More on that another time.

» » » » » » »

4:    A warning to owners of seized dogs. If you upset certain members of the HC, don’t be surprised if you find yourself on the receiving end of one of their dirty tricks campaigns :

Guess who this sewer mind is

This person, and several other HC members, certainly did try their hand at ‘reporting’ Lennox’s family to the tax and benefits offices. Didn’t do them any good of course, because there was nothing to report, therefore no outcome.

Interestingly, some members of the HC were a bit shy about using their own names to do the ‘reporting’. Now that could be because several of them are on benefits themselves (Lennox’s family was not), or it could be they risked further damage to already sullied reputations owing to their complete lack of self-control. 

» » » » » » »

5:   One of our personal favourites :

Guess who is articulate and educated, NOT

» » » » » » »

7:    How low can you go

Guess who stoops to the lowest possible levels

» » » » » » »

8:    Two people commenting together, side by side on Victoria Stilwell’s page. Unusual considering  one of them claims to have had nothing to do with the Hate Campaign nor the people in it up to their necks, and therefore that person surely wouldn’t be seen dead stalking Victoria Stilwell ? 

Guess Who commenting yet again side by side

We’ve already wiped the floor with their Attorney General claims [link 1 / link 2] although to be fair it wasn’t difficult, and nobody took any notice of the HC prattling on about bomb threats and incendiary devices, because we all have Internet access and found out for ourselves what a crock that was. In fact even BCC couldn’t answer questions about their own accusations. But we’ll cover that subject in another blog entry as it’s something we haven’t touched on before. Besides, it will give us the chance to show more examples of the bile spewing forth from people who currently would prefer to be seen as innocent and squeaky clean.

9:    Before we leave Part I, here’s another snapshot of those same two people, who had nothing much to do with one another apparently, but here they’re found commenting on one of their own personal Facebook pages. What a coincidence, not :

Guess who commenting side by side once again

Guess Who Part II coming soon

Peter TALLACK

Featured

We’re covering a statement the Hate Campaign maintain is a direct quote from Peter Tallack in reply to questions one of them apparently sent to him last year.

It’s unknown which HC member is supposed to have asked the questions (Day) but you’re required to believe the whole Q&A thing is genuine  – once again without proof.

♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠

The questions apparently put to Peter Tallack :

In your experience do you think Lennox stands any chance at all of being allowed to live? Could he be reassessed and rehomed somewhere well away from his former home?”

The alleged response from Peter Tallack :

The honest answer from me is, no I don’t think he could be safely re-homed anywhere.

When I examined him he was the most unpredictable PBT I have ever dealt with and that is taking everything into consideration. (1)

I don’t know if you [are] aware the first defence expert used by the Barnes family never even took him out of the kennel, she just said Pit Bull Dangerous!! and that was that. Her statement has never been mentioned or served on the Council. (2)

The second expert as you are aware was David Ryan who stopped his examination when Lennox lunged at him.

The third examination by Sarah was a farce and no real test whatsoever. (3)

Again I don’t know if you are aware but at the first Magistrates hearing there was me and the DW who said he was unpredictable. David Ryan and then Caroline Barnes in evidence said that Lennox had always been bad with strangers and was always leaded and muzzled since they had him. (4)

There were no family photographs of Lennox in the house or with her children which does lean toward our suspicions that Lennox was permanently chained in their yard. (5)

It is my view that Lennox is not a cross breed but pure PBT and for this behaviour is worrying, generally pure PBT when they have been looked after have superb temperaments. I really don’t know but suspect something has changed his temperament/ behaviour. (6)

Again I don’t know if you are aware the only person who has successfully made any bond with Lennox is the dog warden who was slaughtered by the campaign and yet every week drove all the way to the kennels just to spend time with him. (7)

Sadly it is my view that Lennox was the wrong dog to campaign for. There have been many other cases that could have been much more worth while cases. I do believe the law needs amending. (8)

I will say and my view will never change, human life must come first! It is very sad but because of some really stupid people out there, there has to [be a] law to protect human life and this is one of them.

I wish I had a magic wand and banish one or people out there, but I have now been involved in four fatalities in the last five years and three of those have been young children, if I had a pound for every time I’ve heard, if only I’d known or if only!

You can see why it was not a straight forward yes no answer! Sorry! (9) ” 

According to the Hate Campaign the above statement was received via email from Peter Tallack in April 2012… while the case was ongoing.

Bearing in mind Peter Tallack knew why the first defence expert’s report wasn’t used and why that expert and her report were never allowed inclusion in the proceedings, it was very ill-advised and unprofessional of Mr Tallack to draw attention to the subject at all.

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ 

Let’s break the statement down and have a nitpick :

(1)  ” The honest answer from me is, no I don’t think he could be safely re-homed anywhere. When I examined him he was the most unpredictable PBT I have ever dealt with and that is taking everything into consideration. ” 

According to Peter Tallack’s CV, his experience and involvement with ‘Pit Bull Terriers’ spans at least 25 years, some of it within a geographical area that was, according to him, “very densely populated where Pit Bull Terriers became very popular very quickly ” (a district of South London). 

And so we’re all expected to believe that, in 25 or more years and with all that experience and involvement with ‘Pit Bull type dogs‘,  Peter Tallack had NEVER come across a dog as unpredictable as Lennox.  

As usual, there isn’t a speck of recorded proof for that claim, and no witness statements to back it up. Unless you include Sandie Lightfoot, with her alleged ten years similar experience with canines, who oddly enough said the same thing as Tallack, almost word for word, again without proof

The only difference between those two is that Lightfoot’s claims were exposed as outright lies via online evidence, some of which had originally been leaked by the Hate Campaign with the intention of damaging Lennox’s case for his owners, but which justifiably backfired on Lightfoot and the rest of the HC.

It was very convenient for Tallack that his ‘examinations‘ of Lennox (on two occasions*) went unrecorded (not a requirement for the Respondent). In addition, to all intents and purposes Tallack was entirely alone when he conducted his examinations, because there is absolutely no mention of a witness in the court documents, and the issue of an accompanying witness or witnesses to Tallack’s assessments was not brought up in court.

*On the subject of the two visits by Tallack – the court documents state that he attended on the first occasion purely to take measurements and basically ascertain type (Tallack claims he ‘just happened‘ to be in Belfast at the time). That was three weeks after Lennox had been seized.

But on the one hand there’s Tallack in a radio interview saying that his job was to confirm type and, after much hedging, finally admitted (in a roundabout way) that he’s not a qualified behaviourist. On the other hand Tallack visits Lennox again a few months later – to do what exactly? Presumably he’d already taken his ‘measurements’ the first time around, so why come back again, if not to ‘assess’ Lennox’s behaviour, which is something he wasn’t (isn’t) qualified to do.

We should also bear in mind, by that time Lennox’s owner had been advised to agree type in order that Lennox could be assessed on merits, and this was already known long before Tallack’s second visit, so there wasn’t any need for him to see Lennox again, if indeed his involvement was purely about ‘type’.

In fact Tallack himself confirms in his radio interview that it was the responsibility of the Appellant to prove Lennox was not a danger to the public, not the other way around, so why was Tallack ‘assessing’?

And did the cost of that second visit come out of his own pocket, or was it on BCC (tax payer) expenses? Maybe it was included in his extremely generous and unwarranted ‘expert witness’ fee of £7500

(2)  ” don’t know if you [are] aware the first defence expert used by the Barnes family never even took him out of the kennel, she just said Pit Bull Dangerous!! and that was that. Her statement has never been mentioned or served on the Council. 

The only truth in that statement is the last sentence.

Regards his ‘first defence expert’ remark, as Belfast City Council’s ‘expert witness’ and on their payroll at the time, Tallack was unwise to mention something disallowed in court.

His statement that the first defence expert “never even took him out of the kennel, she just said ‘Pit Bull Dangerous’ ”, makes us think that he isn’t the author of the email, because it’s a very blatant lie, as Peter Tallack is fully aware. 

The first expert, Madeleine Forsythe, was not requested by or known to Lennox’s owners; she was brought in by their original solicitor, Angela Douglas, who was effectively dropped by Lennox’s owners for making serious errors and professionally spreading herself thin (link).

As Mr Tallack knows, Madeleine Forsythe assessed Lennox for a considerable amount of time. He’s also aware that she took Lennox out of the kennel without using a catchpole! However, her written report described an entirely different dog and was dated incorrectly. Therefore neither Ms Forsythe nor her assessment were allowed to be included in the proceedings.

(3)  “ The second expert as you are aware was David Ryan who stopped his examination when Lennox lunged at him. The third examination by Sarah was a farce and no real test whatsoever. “

Very conveniently Peter Tallack fails to mention that at the point David Ryan stopped his examination, he had already been assessing Lennox for approximately an hour. Tallack also forgets to mention that David Ryan confirmed Lennox had the opportunity to bite him but chose not to do so (Court Doc 1, clause 25).

Considering Mr Ryan subjected Lennox to lengthy and numerous tests, goading and teasing him in an attempt to elicit an adverse response (at one point bumping Lennox on the nose with his fist), it says a lot about Lennox’s steady temperament that, after all that provocation, the only reaction from him was a lunge as described, followed by an immediate retreat.  A human reaction to that kind of incitement would likely end with Mr Ryan having his face smacked (or worse), even if that human was in a strange place but able to make sense of the situation, unlike Lennox.

Not surprisingly, Peter Tallack calls Sarah Fisher’s examination of Lennox ‘a farce‘; it’s the kind of defensive remark you’d expect from someone like him, with his very limited experience and tunnel-vision.

Tallack has also publicly criticised Ms Fisher’s use of the food she offered to Lennox, implying that she was afraid and attempting to bribe him, but Peter Tallack says absolutely nothing about David Ryan’s routine practice of doing exactly the same thing, as this extract from Mr Ryan’s own report confirms: “…in one movement he lunged towards me, growled, barked and snapped. He did not make.contact with me and returned to sit with Ms Lightfoot. As he did so, I again offered him cheese, which he took immediately in a relaxed manner” .

Unlike Tallack, Sarah Fisher (a fully qualified animal behaviourist with many years experience – link), spent much longer with Lennox, conducting a full and controlled assessment (link), as opposed to the haphazard one that Tallack seems to have carried out.  David Ryan also spent a long time with Lennox; in fact even the original expert who wasn’t allowed a mention (Forsythe) spent time with him.

Tallack, on the other hand, gives the impression that he barely got through the first half hour of his examination, and it’s easy to draw conclusions about that in the absence of a written report or witness statement to say otherwise.

It’s also easy to come to certain other conclusions bearing in mind Tallack’s public announcement that he would not hesitate to control a dog with extreme force. In fact, in one media article he was quoted as saying that standing on a dog’s neck is an acceptable form of control; now that’s something neither he nor the HC can dispute because it’s already ‘out there’ (that’s the downside of the Internet, information just never goes away when you want it to). And let’s not forget that even BCC describe Peter Tallack as a ‘dog handler‘. 

(4)  “ Again I don’t know if you are aware but at the first Magistrates hearing there was me and the DW who said he was unpredictable. David Ryan and then Caroline Barnes in evidence said that Lennox had always been bad with strangers and was always leaded and muzzled since they had him.

We can’t argue with the fact that Tallack and Lightfoot agreed on saying that Lennox was unpredictable, to the point where they mimicked each other’s descriptions, but it looks as if Tallack is also implying that David Ryan knew Lennox was ‘always bad with strangers‘.

It’s difficult to imagine why Tallack thinks David Ryan could know anything of the sort, given that he’d never met Lennox before nor witnessed him in the presence of other strangers, and Lennox’s owner did not use the word ‘always‘. In fact she explained that Lennox had been wary of strangers since an incident with a group of youths. She also stated that he ‘didn’t deal well with strangers who forced themselves upon him‘, which is entirely different to ‘always‘ and ‘totally unpredictable‘, and at no point did she say that Lennox had been ‘leaded and muzzled since they had him‘, so where the hell Tallack plucked that one from is anyone’s guess.

To quote David Ryan from his own assessment of Lennox : 
Lennox was taken from a kennel in the rear of a van by Ms Lightfoot at my request. He was happy to come out of the van and allowed himself to be clipped onto a short lead. As he exited the van his attention was friendly and mostly directed towards Ms Lightfoot. 

He acknowledged my presence but made no unfriendly move towards me, although he was walked to within touching distance of me. He was walked into a garage area where the assessment was to take place and began to sniff about.

To prevent him urine marking. I took the lead from Ms Lightfoot and walked him a short distance to a patch of grass. During this time he paid me little attention…I offered Lennox small pieces of cheese to increase my positive interaction and reduce threat. He took them readily and appeared relaxed on his own with me. “

David Ryan had previously stated: He [Lennox] was walked up to me, a complete stranger, in an environment with which he was not familiar, without incident. This suggests he has no inclination to show aggression to anyone he meets in public if not threatened. 

(5)  “ There were no family photographs of Lennox in the house or with her children which does lean toward our suspicions that Lennox was permanently chained in their yard. “

*Sigh* Here we go again (link). Tallack WAS never, HAS never been inside Lennox’s home. It’s doubtful he’s been anywhere near it, unless he also made a habit of sitting outside their property like other members of the HC (link).

That statement alone almost convinces us that Peter Tallack is not the author of the email because surely he isn’t stupid enough, not only to tell such shockingly bare-faced lies, but to be that arrogant and careless during an ongoing court case in which he was an expert witness?

Or perhaps it was his way of saying that he had the backing and approval of Belfast City Council to say what he likes?

(6)  “ It is my view that Lennox is not a cross breed but pure PBT and for this behaviour is worrying, generally pure PBT when they have been looked after have superb temperaments. I really don’t know but suspect something has changed his temperament/ behaviour. 

Well, we can probably safely say by now that Tallack’s ‘view‘ and opinions are worth precisely zilch. It’s extremely doubtful Lennox was aggressive or unpredictable with Tallack; it’s much more likely he was scared stiff.

Tallack and Lightfoot have had free rein to say what they please because there is no physical evidence to dispute their claims. Equally there is no physical evidence to support their claims. What a tragedy for Lennox and his family that Tallack’s visits weren’t recorded and witnessed impartially, start to finish.

(7)  ” Again I don’t know if you are aware the only person who has successfully made any bond with Lennox is the dog warden who was slaughtered by the campaign and yet every week drove all the way to the kennels just to spend time with him. ” 

Sandie Lightfoot, that ‘pillar of the community, the only one who bonded with Lennox and who went to all the trouble of visiting him every single week of his incarceration’. The same Sandie Lightfoot who, along with Tallack, did her very best to destroy Lennox’s reputation, resulting in his death. For someone who allegedly took months to bond with an animal, she had a strange way of showing her affection. 

Tallack (or whoever wrote the email) has drawn attention to Sandie Lightfoot, the Belfast City Council Dog Warden at the time (now a BCC Animal Welfare Officer if you can believe it). So let’s discuss her briefly and run over a few points.

Sandie Lightfoot :

  • testified under oath that it took her six months to build a relationship with Lennox, and  yet we’ve all seen solid evidence released very soon after Lennox was seized showing Lightfoot looking extremely comfortable and relaxed in his company, almost distracted in fact (link);
  • claimed she visited Lennox once each week, but could not prove it, and when asked to provide visual evidence that Lennox was in good health during his incarceration, she ‘leaked’ photographs of an entirely different (and healthy, happy) dog, passing him off as Lennox (link);
  • was regularly found on Facebook using a fake profile (more on that in another entry);
  • could provide no evidence to support her claims that Lennox was ‘one of the most aggressive and unpredictable dogs she had ever met‘;
  • lied under oath – Lightfoot’s false claim that Lennox’s owner had said ‘the dog will rip your head off‘ could not be corroborated by the colleague who was with her at the time. When cross-examined in court, Lightfoot’s colleague stated that she did not hear those words being spoken.  Therefore that false claim was dismissed.
  • lied about stalking – a letter from her employers, Belfast City Council confirmed that Lightfoot was indeed sitting outside Lennox’s owner’s house on at least one occasion. That letter contained a warning to the owners not to use images they had taken of Lightfoot that day, therefore BCC themselves confirmed she was outside their property and was not, as BCC had previously falsely claimed, ‘on indefinite leave‘;

(8)  “ Sadly it is my view that Lennox was the wrong dog to campaign for. There have been many other cases that could have been much more worth while cases. I do believe the law needs amending.

Lennox wasn’t the wrong dog, he was absolutely the right one and his case alone has brought attention to deceitful and morally-challenged people such as Tallack and Lightfoot, not to mention an atrocious, ineffectual and dysfunctional law.

As for an amendment to the law, that just shows Tallack for what he is, unintelligent and narrow-minded. The law needs to be abolished, scrapped, and the emphasis placed elsewhere, on owners and backyard breeders.

Lennox, aged five years old at the time, never had a complaint made against him for any reason. He had never bitten anyone (in spite of ‘someone’ at BCC telling Sarah Fisher a different fabricated story), and he had never been threatening or aggressive. He didn’t bite David Ryan and Sandie Lightfoot has not been able to show evidence to support her own claims because they are false.

So that just leaves Peter Tallack, and it begs the question, what was the real reason he used a catchpole to keep Lennox at bay? Was it to goad him into some kind of reaction, or maybe Tallack had already done that? Or perhaps he just needed to show Lennox in a bad light. Whatever his reasons, it wasn’t due to Lennox being aggressive and unpredictable, because we all know he wasn’t. 

(9) ” I will say and my view will never change, human life must come first! It is very sad but because of some really stupid people out there, there has to [be a] law to protect human life and this is one of them. I wish I had a magic wand and banish one or people out there, but I have now been involved in four fatalities in the last five years and three of those have been young children, if I had a pound for every time I’ve heard, if only I’d known or if only! You can see why it was not a straight forward yes no answer! Sorry! 

Tallack showing there that he hasn’t a clue, although he’s right about one thing, there are some really stupid people out there. He’s friends with some of them and the next time he passes a mirror he’ll find another.

As for the magic wand, he might try using it for some self-improvement. If he really had absorbed and taken on board anything worthwhile in the last thirty years, you’d think he would have twigged by now that human behaviour is the problem. BSL is an ineffectual, grotesque sticky plaster, not a cure nor a remedy. The problem should be tackled where it starts, with the owners.

Maybe Tallack could try his violent dog-control techniques on the next bad owner he meets, see how far that gets him. That owner might have something to say about it, a dog doesn’t have a voice; it doesn’t have a choice. And neither did Lennox.

Tallack spent very little overall time with Lennox, yet used a catchpole on him. Not one other person who came into contact with Lennox needed to do that. He was observed with a neck injury that hadn’t existed before Tallack assessed him. Another easily drawn conclusion. 

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Quick recap

  • There are no records or physical evidence to support Peter Tallack’s claims that Lennox was ‘aggressive and unpredictable‘;
  • There are no records or physical evidence confirming that Tallack’s visits to Lennox were witnessed by anyone;
  • There are no records or physical evidence to support Sandie Lightfoot’s claims that Lennox was ‘aggressive and unpredictable‘;

Everyone asks the same thing, ‘How is it that Peter Tallack remained a constable for all those years, without promotion‘. We think the clue lies in his attitude and conduct highlighted during the Lennox case.

It’s very telling that Sandie Lightfoot and Mel Page count him as a good friend, and it says everything about their poor moral standards we’ve come to know so well.

We’ve had a few messages asking us to include some information about Peter Tallack’s conduct and comments in court. Many people witnessed it on the day, so it’s only right to share it here

During cross-examination, Mr Tallack became increasingly agitated, sweating heavily and wiping his brow. Obviously extremely uncomfortable at being questioned, here are two examples of his conduct:

  • Peter Tallack, referring to Lennox’s owner, Caroline Barnes, randomly challenged her right to own a dog owing to the fact that she walked with a limp and required a walking stick;
  • Peter Tallack, whilst testifying in the witness stand, turned to the Judge complaining that he could not continue because ‘people were looking at him‘ !

Yes exactly, you really couldn’t make it up!

Let’s also not forget that during the Nando Brown radio interview on 14 July 2012, Peter Tallack clearly stated, at length, that it was the first time he had spoken out in public or given an interview about the Lennox case. His earlier interview for the Nolan Show, Radio Ulster on 31 March 2011 must have slipped his mind (link).

Tallack’s interview on the Nando Brown show begins at roughly 25 minutes (link below). You’ll hear Mr Tallack start with a touch of grovelling, then avoidance (re: his qualifications). After that your mouth will likely drop open at the lies spewing forth. He even manages to mention the first expert witness.

Then you’ll probably start going red in the face yourself when you hear the malice directed at Lennox’s family (try not to stick a fist through the computer screen). Be warned – you’ll hear the familiar innuendo and gossip that we’ve witnessed so often with the rest of the Hate Campaign. He’s even arrogant enough to imply on air that Lennox was a yard dog!

The rest of the show is taken up, quite rightly, by an interview with Sarah Fisher plus a chat with Victoria Stilwell and Jim Crosby. Well worth a listen, all of it. And someone very closely connected to the Hate Campaign makes a cameo appearance with some interesting own goal comments. (LINK)

Peter Tallack

A blog with one purpose for Sarah GUNTHER

Featured

Sarah Gunthers blog For the Love of Dogz supposedly about Bruce but actually about Lennox BSL owners

For the Love of Dogz! – Blogging the truth is a Sarah Gunther creation. It will come as no great surprise that her blog isn’t really about putting records straight or solely ‘for the love of dogz‘ in general.  

And although they both get a mention, it’s not even about ‘Bruce her (golden) Goose’, as she calls him (yes, really), or her pal Sandie Lightfoot – it’s about Sarah Gunther finding another way of venting her festering resentment and taking potshots at Lennox’s owners, with a quick swipe at Victoria Stilwell plus a stab at ‘other rescues’ along the way.

Gunther started her blog in July 2012, a few days after Lennox was destroyed, and it’s been abandoned since September of the same year, active just long enough to spill the bile eating away at her like a maggot.

From information and screenshots you’ve provided, it seems Gunther has always been very confident that the inaccuracies and fabrications littering her blog are taken as fact, so it’s time to put that right.

The initial post (link) drew our attention more because it contains, almost verbatim, the same accusations and allegations found on The Lav (LLAAV), the trolls’ website.

We’ll briefly go through some of Gunther’s comments here, and cover more points in an additional post – Feedback for Sarah Gunther.

» Statement re Lennox «
The above screenshot shows Gunther ensuring the email extract heavily implies Lennox was a full time yard dog when, in fact, she knew ‘being kept in a secure back garden’ meant nothing of the sort.

She’s never coughed up the full emails as evidence. You’d expect to see a screenshot of said emails start to finish, including headers and footers. In fact she’s never come up with so much as one sentence. You’ll just have to take her word for everything she says, much like Page and Rushmore.

In her blog, Gunther goes on to boldly state as fact that Lennox was a yard dog, in spite of never having been to his home nor possessing any proof to support her accusation. In fact even if Gunther’s mate Sandie Lightfoot had provided her with that information, it still wouldn’t hold water, because Lightfoot’s habit of sitting outside Lennox’s home (with the intention of intimidating his owners) happened after he was seized.

The ‘yard and status‘ dog claims are very familiar stories spread by all the other HC members, but in light of Gunther’s comments and source for her false allegations, it must be assumed the others took their cue directly from her.

According to the flotsam of the HC (as opposed to the Jetsam), they’ve never even met each other let alone Sarah Gunther, so if that’s the case they’ve obviously been spreading rumours based solely on information supplied by her, at face value, although it should be remembered it was the (still very active) people behind the fake Heather Jones and Roxanne Summers profiles who ran with the ‘yard and status dog‘ stories. The rest of the HC, the hangers-on, merely supported, agreed and shared. 

In fact that whole post contains exactly what we’ve all seen on HC pages and websites, time and again – the same wild accusations and suppositions, the exact same lies, word for word. Strange.

According to Gunther, she has nothing to do with the HC and couldn’t possibly be one of the people hiding behind a fake profile. The reality is that, in spite of being the proprietor of a so-called busy animal rescue, she still spends most of time waging a vendetta against a family, all because she didn’t get her own way. Sounds familiar doesn’t it Mel Page?

How important are those animals to her if she’s prepared to give up precious time blogging and posting lies on Facebook, The Lav and various HC pages, when that time could be better spent elsewhere?

For example, Gunther made herself very busy with her vindictive accusations, including links to media articles regarding threats made to BCC employees:

  • The so-called petrol-soaked letters, smashed windows and tyre slashing claims:  Whoever delivered these stories to the media were obviously undecided about who had received the threats, because at first it was reported to be Sandie Lightfoot, then it changed to Yolanda Elwood. However, in the end the PSNI did not follow up any of those complaints owing to the fact that THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE to back up the claims. So what happened – did the petrol-soaked letter get accidentally binned and the windows and tyres repair themselves?

Those links are intended to make it appear as if Lennox’s owners and closest supporters were responsible for the alleged (and most likely non-existent) attacks and abuse, otherwise why include them? Again more lies and, in any case, not a shred of evidence.

That in itself isn’t surprising, we’ve seen it happen repeatedly with the HC, but it doesn’t make any sense that someone with supposedly so much to lose has so little self-control that even as late as July 2012 (two years after her offer to take Lennox was rejected) she still held a grudge, resentment still eating away. 

Gunther obviously published that post in July last year because Lennox had been killed a few days earlier, but the content makes it obvious it wasn’t due to any kind of sadness that his cause had been lost and she was, at the very least, instrumental in trying to harm his reputation – her own blog confirms it. So why did she choose to write it so soon after Lennox had been destroyed? 

Most people are now of the opinion that the refusal to allow Gunther’s involvement was the main catalyst for the start of the Hate Campaign, and you all know the reasons why her offer was turned down.

Had Gunther responded to the owners with an ‘ok fine, it’s your decision‘ and left it at that, the chances are that many of the false rumours and ‘facts’ based on conjecture and malicious lies wouldn’t have occurred at all, that’s if you leave Sandie Lightfoot and Mel Page out of the equation, which isn’t easy to do.

Sarah Gunther didn’t leave it at that, she responded with bitterness and proved that she’s incapable of constraint and unable to remain unbiased, but then complained about the response and backlash she received.

She blamed other people’s reaction for her own behaviour towards the family, made excuses that others were criticising her, asking why she wasn’t offering to help Lennox, using that as a reason to fan the flames of the Hate Campaign.

There were a few grounds for the owners refusal of Gunther’s offer; one because it did not occur to them Lennox would never come home (choosing to legally fight his case – something Ms Gunther refers to as ‘not cooperating’**).

The other reason of course is kept quiet by Gunther – Caroline Barnes sent numerous emails to different people asking for advice very soon after Lennox had been seized. However, it was only when Lennox’s story became more high profile that Ms Gunther responded, by which time the process was in motion.

Gunther maintains the family pestered her for help over several weeks – another lie, made obvious by the fact that she has never been able back up that claim.

In any case, even if Lennox’s owners had known their efforts to save him were going to be in vain, they would have opted for someone else other than Gunther to take him. She doesn’t have the best of reputations as you all know, and is famously very cagey about her past.

Whatever made Lennox’s owners refuse Gunther’s help, their instincts were obviously spot-on and it was exactly the right decision to make.

(**At one point in her blog, Gunther cites differences between the reactions of the respective owners of Lennox and Bruce, and this particular comment of hers inadvertently illustrates the real reason for her unmasked hatred of Caroline Barnes and Craig Winters:Bruce’s owner cooperated with the Courts and us“.)

» Musings of the day «
Not much we need say about that post from Gunther; it speaks for itself, full of resentment and jealousy.

Just one observation though – Gunther seems to admire Terrierman (Patrick Burns); she quotes and lauds him on his observations of Victoria Stilwell. Yep, he’s a real nice chap that Mr Burns

Patrick Burns Terrier man

When she created that blog, Sarah Gunther must have been convinced she would be taken seriously by everyone who read it. Perhaps she was guilty of believing her own publicity and opinion of herself, or maybe she was buoyed-up by the support from like-minded, bitter and vindictive people; who knows, but she was obviously very confident she couldn’t risk her self-styled reputation and the lives of all the dogs she claims to help, because for the most part it’s made up of conjecture, gossip and lies

In reality, Sarah Gunther is unprofessional, unstable, envious and malicious.

If this isn’t STALKING, what is?

Boycott Boycott Belfast Heather Jones Roxanne Summers Mel Page Facebook stalking Lennoxs owners

More vindictive and spiteful photoshopping from the Hate Campaign. After dressing up the photo in balloons, the Hate Campaign then went on to ridicule and celebrate the fact that Lennox had been seized.

Whoever took that photo either stood and faced the house, pointing the camera/phone directly towards it (in full view of other residents) or was inside a vehicle [link].

Bearing in mind the house is in a close (cul-de-sac), a vehicle such as, say, a Belfast City Council dog warden van, would have to be driven all the way inside to turn around, or reversed into the close from the road. Either way, the driver would have got out of the vehicle, or had her hand stuck outside in order to get an image that clear. 

[link 1 / link 2].

Boycott Boycott Belfast Heather Jones Roxanne Summers Mel Page Facebook stalking Lennoxs owners admitting taking photo

Who could possibly have posted that comment on the now defunct Boycott Boycott Belfast page – the charmer who took the photo, the weasel (apologies to weasels) who supplied it, or the dirtbag who photoshopped it, assuming it wasn’t the work of just one single twit?

The admin who made the comment either wanted to give the impression she’d taken the photo or is admitting to it, which complicates things as far as Lightfoot is concerned really.

For sake of argument, we have to consider that it was someone else (or Lightfoot disguised as someone else).

We know the (now removed) Roxanne Summers‘ ID’s and Heather Jones‘ profiles were among the admin on BBB, and we also know the real people behind those ID’s are still very active [link]. But the only person likely to find herself parked outside the Lennox family home is Sandie Lightfoot.  

So although it seems convoluted, there’s really no need to overthink it.

______________________________________________

Transcription:

Roxanne Summers / Heather Jones / aka (link), says:
Is that Lennox’s chain on the chimney?”
“Is Tinkerbell one of the celebs lining up to help save Lennox?”
“Can you believe this is what they were twitting when I was taking the photograph…”
“It can’t be Lennox’s chain on the chimney because it’s not bolted to a wall”

Amy Miller (link) replies:  Looks a nice chain! My guess, it could be some of the bling Craig bought with the donation money”

Ruth McKinley (Facebook) replies:  Smokin. Who lives in a house like that 🙂

Roxanne Summers / Heather Jones / aka (Facebook) says:  
“I do believe that is **** Close. Now who could live in a house like that?”
Well not Lennox anyway lol